Ballast Markets logoBallast Markets
MarketsStackWhy BallastPortsChokepointsInsightsLearn
Join the Waitlist

AIS Shipping Data API - Real-Time Vessel Intelligence

AIS (Automatic Identification System) data has become the foundational layer for maritime supply chain visibility, enabling real-time tracking of 90,000+ commercial vessels globally. For procurement teams managing $10M-$500M annual freight spend, AIS APIs provide critical intelligence: when will your supplier's shipment arrive? Is Port of Los Angeles congestion increasing? Are competitors front-loading inventory ahead of tariff increases? This comprehensive guide covers AIS technical specifications, data accuracy, API architecture, pricing tiers, integration patterns, and ROI examples—helping supply chain teams select and implement vessel tracking solutions.

What Is AIS (Automatic Identification System)?

AIS (Automatic Identification System) is a maritime tracking system mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in 2004 for vessels over 300 gross tons on international voyages, as well as all passenger vessels regardless of size. AIS enhances maritime safety by broadcasting each vessel's position, identity, and navigation status to nearby ships and shore stations, preventing collisions and enabling search-and-rescue operations.

How AIS Works: Technical Overview

AIS Transponders: Every AIS-equipped vessel carries a transponder that automatically broadcasts messages via VHF radio (161.975 MHz and 162.025 MHz channels). Class A transponders (commercial vessels) transmit every 2-10 seconds while underway, every 3 minutes at anchor. Class B transponders (smaller vessels) transmit every 30 seconds at speeds >2 knots.

AIS Message Types:

  • Message Type 1/2/3 (Position Reports): Transmitted every 2-10 seconds while moving, contains latitude, longitude, speed over ground (SOG), course over ground (COG), heading, rate of turn, navigational status (underway, at anchor, moored)
  • Message Type 5 (Static and Voyage Data): Transmitted every 6 minutes, contains MMSI, IMO number, call sign, vessel name, vessel type, dimensions (length, beam, draft), destination, ETA
  • Message Type 18/19 (Class B Position Reports): Simplified position reports for smaller vessels
  • Message Type 24 (Class B Static Data): Vessel identification for Class B transponders

Reception Methods:

  1. Terrestrial AIS: Coastal base stations receive signals from vessels within 40-60 nautical miles (74-111 km), depending on antenna height and atmospheric conditions. Coverage limited to coastal zones and major shipping lanes with shore infrastructure.

  2. Satellite AIS: Orbiting satellites (e.g., Spire Global's 100+ nanosatellite constellation, Orbcomm, exactEarth) receive AIS signals globally, including mid-ocean areas beyond terrestrial coverage. Satellites experience signal collisions when many vessels transmit simultaneously, reducing message reception rates to 20-80% depending on vessel density.

Global AIS Coverage Statistics

Vessel coverage: AIS tracking covers 90,000+ active commercial vessels globally as of 2024, including:

  • Container ships: ~5,500 vessels
  • Bulk carriers: ~12,000 vessels
  • Oil tankers: ~7,500 vessels
  • Chemical tankers: ~4,500 vessels
  • LNG/LPG carriers: ~1,800 vessels
  • General cargo: ~15,000 vessels
  • Ro-ro and vehicle carriers: ~1,200 vessels

Geographic coverage:

  • Coastal zones (<100 nm from shore): 95%+ message reception via terrestrial AIS
  • Mid-ocean (>100 nm from shore): 70-90% message reception via satellite AIS, with 5-30 minute update intervals
  • Polar regions: Sparse satellite coverage (fewer passes), 30-60 minute update intervals
  • High-density areas (Singapore Strait, Dover Strait): Signal collisions reduce satellite reception to 20-40%

Data processing volume: Major AIS data providers process 30-50 million AIS messages daily from 250,000+ vessels (commercial and recreational), according to Orbcomm 2024 data.

AIS Data Quality and Limitations

Position accuracy: AIS relies on onboard GPS, providing ±10-50 meter accuracy for terrestrial AIS and ±100-500 meter accuracy for satellite AIS due to signal processing delays and doppler effects. However, accuracy degrades when:

  • GPS signals are jammed or spoofed (reported in Persian Gulf, Black Sea, Eastern Mediterranean)
  • Vessels manually enter incorrect positions
  • Transponders malfunction or lack GPS synchronization

Data completeness: Not all AIS fields are reliably populated:

  • Destination port: 60-70% accuracy—crew often enter codes incorrectly or fail to update destination mid-voyage
  • ETA: 40-50% accuracy—typically not updated as voyage progresses, leading to stale estimates
  • Draft: 80-90% accuracy—updated at departure but not adjusted for fuel consumption during voyage
  • Cargo type: 50-60% accuracy—often shows vessel type rather than actual cargo carried

Coverage gaps:

  • Military vessels: May not transmit AIS or use encrypted channels
  • Fishing vessels: Small fishing boats (<300 GT) not required to carry AIS
  • Deliberate disabling: "Dark shipping" occurs when vessels disable AIS to evade sanctions, avoid piracy, or engage in illegal activities (estimated 5-10% of global fleet sporadically disables AIS)
  • Signal interference: Dense coastal areas and port environments experience signal collisions and interference

Spoofing and manipulation: AIS is an unauthenticated system vulnerable to:

  • Position spoofing: Broadcasting false positions (e.g., showing vessel in one location while actually elsewhere)
  • Identity theft: Broadcasting another vessel's MMSI to create confusion
  • GPS jamming: Regional GPS jamming forces vessels to manual navigation, disrupting AIS position accuracy

Advanced AIS data providers use anomaly detection algorithms to identify spoofing (e.g., vessels "teleporting," traveling at impossible speeds >40 knots for bulk carriers, or reporting positions on land).

Technical Specifications: Coverage, Update Frequency, and Data Points

Update Frequency: Real-Time vs Historical

Terrestrial AIS update rates (per IMO regulations):

| Vessel Condition | Class A Update Interval | Class B Update Interval | |-----------------|------------------------|------------------------| | At anchor / moored | 3 minutes | 3 minutes | | Underway 0-14 knots | 10 seconds | 30 seconds | | Underway 14-23 knots | 6 seconds | 30 seconds | | Underway >23 knots | 2 seconds | 30 seconds | | Vessel turning | 2 seconds | 30 seconds |

Satellite AIS update rates:

  • Low-earth orbit (LEO) satellites: Pass overhead every 90-110 minutes, receiving AIS signals during 10-15 minute windows
  • Effective update frequency: 5-30 minutes for well-covered ocean areas, 30-90 minutes for sparse coverage regions
  • Vessel density impact: High-traffic areas (Singapore Strait, English Channel) experience more signal collisions, reducing individual vessel update frequency

API delivery frequencies:

  • Streaming APIs (WebSocket): Real-time updates delivered within 30 seconds to 2 minutes of AIS reception
  • REST API polling: Typical caching of 5-15 minutes for standard plans, 1-5 minutes for premium plans
  • Batch/bulk APIs: Historical data with hourly, daily, or monthly aggregation

Data Points Included in AIS Messages

Static vessel information (updated every 6 minutes via Message Type 5):

| Field | Description | Reliability | |-------|-------------|-------------| | MMSI | Maritime Mobile Service Identity (9-digit unique ID) | 100% (primary identifier) | | IMO Number | International Maritime Organization number (7-digit) | 95% (permanent vessel ID) | | Call Sign | Radio call sign | 90% | | Vessel Name | Ship name | 95% | | Vessel Type | Cargo, tanker, passenger, etc. (Type code 60-89) | 98% | | Dimensions | Length, beam (width) in meters | 95% | | Draft | Current draft in meters | 80% (often not updated) |

Dynamic position data (updated every 2-10 seconds via Message Types 1/2/3):

| Field | Description | Reliability | |-------|-------------|-------------| | Latitude / Longitude | GPS position (decimal degrees) | 98% (when GPS available) | | Speed Over Ground (SOG) | Speed in knots | 98% | | Course Over Ground (COG) | Direction of movement (0-360 degrees) | 98% | | Heading | Direction vessel is pointing (may differ from COG) | 95% | | Rate of Turn | Degrees per minute | 90% | | Navigational Status | Underway, at anchor, moored, not under command, etc. | 95% | | Timestamp | UTC time of position | 100% |

Voyage data (updated every 6 minutes via Message Type 5):

| Field | Description | Reliability | |-------|-------------|-------------| | Destination | Destination port code or name | 60-70% (crew-entered, often incorrect) | | ETA | Estimated time of arrival (UTC) | 40-50% (rarely updated mid-voyage) | | Cargo Type | Type of cargo carried | 50-60% (often shows vessel type, not cargo) |

API Data Formats: JSON, CSV, WebSocket Streaming

Modern AIS APIs provide multiple data access patterns:

RESTful JSON APIs:

{
  "mmsi": 367529310,
  "imo": 9632179,
  "vessel_name": "MSC MAYA",
  "vessel_type": "Container Ship",
  "position": {
    "latitude": 33.7297,
    "longitude": -118.2750,
    "timestamp": "2025-01-02T18:45:32Z"
  },
  "dynamics": {
    "speed": 8.2,
    "course": 187,
    "heading": 185,
    "status": "Underway using engine"
  },
  "voyage": {
    "destination": "USLAX",
    "eta": "2025-01-03T06:00:00Z",
    "draft": 13.5
  }
}

CSV Bulk Exports:

mmsi,imo,vessel_name,lat,lon,speed,course,timestamp,destination
367529310,9632179,MSC MAYA,33.7297,-118.2750,8.2,187,2025-01-02T18:45:32Z,USLAX

WebSocket Streaming:

// Subscribe to real-time updates for specific vessel
ws.send(JSON.stringify({
  action: "subscribe",
  mmsi: [367529310, 477125300, 563073400]
}));

// Receive position updates every 30-60 seconds
ws.onmessage = (event) => {
  const update = JSON.parse(event.data);
  console.log(`${update.vessel_name} at ${update.position.latitude}, ${update.position.longitude}`);
};

API Architecture: RESTful Endpoints, WebSocket Streaming, and Rate Limits

Common API Endpoints

Most AIS API providers offer similar endpoint structures:

1. /vessels - List all vessels

  • Returns metadata for all vessels in coverage area
  • Supports filtering by vessel type, flag state, size
  • Example: GET /api/v1/vessels?type=container&flag=USA

2. /vessels/{mmsi} - Get specific vessel

  • Returns current position and details for a single vessel by MMSI or IMO
  • Example: GET /api/v1/vessels/367529310

3. /positions - Historical positions (track)

  • Returns position history for a vessel over time range
  • Example: GET /api/v1/positions?mmsi=367529310&start=2025-01-01&end=2025-01-07

4. /areas - Vessels in geographic region

  • Returns all vessels within bounding box or polygon
  • Example: GET /api/v1/areas?bbox=-118.5,33.5,-118.0,34.0 (Los Angeles port area)

5. /ports - Vessels at or near ports

  • Returns vessels within geofence of specific port
  • Example: GET /api/v1/ports/USLAX (vessels at Los Angeles)

6. /routes - Voyage history and predictions

  • Returns historical routes, port calls, and predicted next destination
  • Example: GET /api/v1/routes?mmsi=367529310&days=30

WebSocket Streaming for Real-Time Updates

WebSocket APIs enable sub-minute latency for tracking fleets or monitoring specific vessels:

Connection establishment:

const ws = new WebSocket('wss://api.aisdata.com/stream');

ws.onopen = () => {
  // Authenticate
  ws.send(JSON.stringify({
    action: 'auth',
    api_key: 'YOUR_API_KEY'
  }));

  // Subscribe to vessels or geographic areas
  ws.send(JSON.stringify({
    action: 'subscribe',
    vessels: [367529310, 477125300],  // Specific vessels
    areas: [{ bbox: [-118.5, 33.5, -118.0, 34.0] }]  // LA port area
  }));
};

ws.onmessage = (event) => {
  const update = JSON.parse(event.data);
  // Process position updates in real-time
  updateMap(update);
};

Update delivery: Position updates delivered within 30-120 seconds of AIS reception, depending on provider processing latency.

Backpressure handling: High-volume streams may buffer updates; implement client-side queuing to avoid dropped messages.

Rate Limits and Authentication

API rate limits by tier (typical across providers):

| Tier | Requests per Hour | Requests per Day | Concurrent WebSocket Connections | |------|-------------------|------------------|----------------------------------| | Free | 100 | 1,000 | 0 (polling only) | | Hobbyist | 1,000 | 10,000 | 1 | | Business | 10,000 | 100,000 | 5-10 | | Enterprise | 100,000+ | Unlimited | 50-100+ |

Authentication methods:

  • API keys: Simple bearer token passed in Authorization header or query parameter
  • OAuth 2.0: Token-based authentication with refresh tokens for long-lived integrations
  • IP whitelisting: Enterprise plans allow restricting API access to specific IP ranges
  • JWT tokens: Short-lived tokens for secure multi-tenant applications

Quota management: Most providers offer quota dashboards showing current usage, rate limit headers in API responses, and webhook alerts when approaching limits.

Use Cases with ROI Examples

1. Freight Procurement: Route Optimization and Cost Savings

Use case: A $300M revenue electronics manufacturer imports $45M annually in components from China and Taiwan through Los Angeles and Long Beach ports. Freight procurement team uses AIS data to:

Implementation:

  • Track 200+ supplier shipments monthly via AIS API
  • Monitor port congestion (count vessels at anchor >5 days)
  • Correlate vessel arrival patterns with spot freight rate movements
  • Time container bookings when port congestion decreases

AIS data insights:

  • Identified 8-10 day vessel queues at LA/LB during peak season (Aug-Oct 2024)
  • Observed 15-20% decline in vessel arrivals during Chinese New Year (Jan-Feb)
  • Detected competitors front-loading inventory ahead of tariff changes (40% increase in vessel arrivals 4 weeks before Section 301 tariff implementation)

Results:

  • $2.1M annual freight savings (4.7% of freight spend):
    • Shifted 30% of volume to Oakland and Seattle when LA congestion exceeded 7-day threshold, saving $750K in detention/demurrage and spot rate premiums
    • Booked contracts 8-12 weeks ahead when AIS data showed declining vessel arrivals (lower spot rate environment), saving $900K
    • Avoided last-minute air freight ($12K/container vs $3K ocean) by accurately predicting vessel arrival delays using AIS ETA algorithms, saving $450K
  • ROI: $2.1M savings vs $120K AIS API cost (Business tier) = 17.5× ROI

2. Port Congestion Tracking: Berth Planning for Terminal Operators

Use case: Port of Houston container terminal operator manages berth allocation for 1,200 vessel calls annually. AIS data enables predictive berth planning:

Implementation:

  • Real-time monitoring of vessels in Houston Ship Channel approach (geofence within 50 nm)
  • Correlation of vessel ETA with actual arrival times (AIS position + speed-based ETA calculation)
  • Integration with terminal operating system (TOS) for automated berth assignment

AIS data insights:

  • 68% of vessels arrive within ±6 hours of AIS-calculated ETA (vs 42% accuracy for crew-reported ETA)
  • Average 3.2-day advance notice when vessels enter 200 nm geofence
  • Hurricane season causes 40-50% increase in vessels delaying arrival (hovering outside port until storm passes)

Results:

  • $1.8M annual productivity gains:
    • Reduced idle berth time by 18% through better arrival prediction, enabling 85 additional vessel calls annually (85 calls × $8K berthing fee × 0.25 incremental margin = $170K profit)
    • Decreased labor overtime costs by $650K through improved shift planning based on 12-24 hour arrival forecasts
    • Reduced demurrage disputes by $980K by providing vessel operators with AIS-verified arrival timestamps (vs crew-reported times)
  • ROI: $1.8M gains vs $45K AIS API cost (Business tier, Houston region only) = 40× ROI

3. Competitive Intelligence: Track Competitor Shipments

Use case: $500M revenue furniture retailer monitors competitor import volumes to inform inventory and pricing strategies:

Implementation:

  • Identify competitor supplier factories in Vietnam, China, Malaysia via trade records
  • Track vessels departing supplier regions with furniture cargo (filter by vessel type + destination)
  • Count competitor containers using AIS vessel capacity data + estimated load factors
  • Correlate import volumes with competitor promotional campaigns

AIS data insights:

  • Competitor A increased imports from Vietnam by 35% in Q2 2024 (45 vessels vs 33 vessels prior quarter), signaling inventory buildup ahead of holiday season
  • Competitor B shifted 20% of volume from China to Vietnam between Q4 2023 and Q2 2024 (likely tariff diversification strategy)
  • Aggregate market imports declined 12% during Red Sea crisis (Feb-Apr 2024), but Competitor C maintained volumes by switching to air freight for high-velocity SKUs

Results:

  • $3.2M competitive advantage:
    • Matched competitor inventory buildups, avoiding stockouts during holiday season (estimated $1.8M in preserved revenue)
    • Identified competitor's tariff diversification to Vietnam 8 weeks before public announcement, enabling the company to accelerate own Vietnam sourcing strategy ($900K tariff savings)
    • Detected competitor's reduced imports signaling inventory liquidation, allowing the company to hold prices and maintain margins ($500K incremental profit)
  • ROI: $3.2M advantage vs $95K AIS API cost (Business tier, Asia-U.S. routes) = 33.7× ROI

4. Supply Chain Visibility: Customer Shipment ETAs

Use case: $150M revenue industrial equipment distributor provides customers with real-time shipment visibility for 3,500 inbound containers annually:

Implementation:

  • Match customer orders to container bookings (using BOL numbers, booking references)
  • Track vessel position via AIS API
  • Calculate dynamic ETA using current vessel speed, distance to port, historical port wait times
  • Provide customer portal with live shipment tracking

AIS data insights:

  • AIS-calculated ETAs reduce customer inquiries by 60% (from 840 monthly inquiries to 340)
  • 82% of shipments arrive within ±12 hours of AIS-calculated ETA (vs ±48 hours for carrier-provided ETA)
  • Customers value transparency—NPS score increased from 42 to 58 after implementing shipment visibility

Results:

  • $780K annual benefits:
    • Reduced customer service labor costs by $420K (2.5 FTE equivalent saved by reducing ETA inquiries)
    • Improved customer retention worth estimated $250K annual contract value (3% churn reduction × $8.3M at-risk annual revenue)
    • Enabled premium "white-glove tracking" service tier at $50/shipment for 1,200 customers annually = $60K new revenue
    • Reduced expedited freight costs by $50K through better arrival planning (fewer last-minute air freight shipments to meet customer deadlines)
  • ROI: $780K benefits vs $24K AIS API cost (Business tier) = 32.5× ROI

5. Hedge Timing: Correlation with Freight Rate Movements

Use case: Commodity trader managing $80M annual freight spend uses AIS data to inform timing of freight derivative positions:

Implementation:

  • Monitor vessel arrivals at Shanghai, Ningbo, Shenzhen (export ports)
  • Track vessel departures from Shanghai to Los Angeles route
  • Correlate vessel activity with Freightos Baltic Index (FBX01) container rates
  • Use AIS signals to inform container freight swap entries and exits

AIS data insights:

  • 7-10 day decline in Shanghai departures correlates with 8-12% increase in FBX spot rates (r² = 0.68)
  • Port congestion at LA (vessels at anchor >15) correlates with 15-20% spot rate premium within 2-3 weeks
  • Golden Week (China holiday) shows 40-50% reduction in departures, followed by 60% surge in following 2 weeks

Results:

  • $1.4M annual freight hedging gains:
    • Used AIS departure data to time FFA entries, capturing $680K in favorable movements (entered long positions when AIS showed declining departures 10 days before FBX rallied)
    • Exited positions early when AIS showed normalized departure patterns, avoiding $520K in losses from subsequent rate declines
    • Improved hedge timing reduced average slippage from 4.2% to 1.8%, saving $200K annually in execution costs
  • ROI: $1.4M gains vs $60K AIS API cost (Business tier, Asia-Pacific region) = 23.3× ROI

Data Quality and Coverage: Accuracy, Gaps, and Anomaly Detection

Position Accuracy: ±50 Meters vs ±500 Meters

Terrestrial AIS accuracy (coastal zones):

  • Position: ±10-50 meters (GPS standard accuracy)
  • Timestamp: ±1 second (synchronized to GPS time)
  • Speed/Course: ±0.1 knots, ±1 degree (derived from GPS position changes)

Satellite AIS accuracy (open ocean):

  • Position: ±100-500 meters (doppler correction, signal processing delays)
  • Timestamp: ±10-30 seconds (satellite reception time + ground processing)
  • Speed/Course: ±0.5 knots, ±5 degrees (lower update frequency reduces derivative accuracy)

Factors degrading accuracy:

  • GPS jamming: Persian Gulf, Black Sea, Eastern Mediterranean experience regional GPS jamming (reported accuracy degradation to ±1-5 km)
  • Multipath interference: Tall structures near ports (cranes, buildings) cause GPS signal reflections, reducing accuracy to ±50-200 meters
  • Transponder malfunctions: 2-5% of transponders report erroneous positions due to hardware failures or incorrect configuration

Coverage Gaps: Mid-Ocean, Dense Areas, and Deliberate Disabling

Mid-ocean coverage gaps:

  • Satellite revisit time: LEO satellites pass overhead every 90-110 minutes, creating 30-90 minute gaps between AIS updates for individual vessels in mid-ocean
  • Signal collisions: When multiple vessels transmit simultaneously, satellite receivers experience collisions (up to 80% message loss in high-density areas like Singapore Strait)
  • Polar regions: Fewer satellite passes at high latitudes result in 60-120 minute update intervals near Arctic/Antarctic

Dense area signal collisions:

  • Singapore Strait: 200+ vessels in 10 nm² area cause 40-60% message loss for satellite AIS
  • English Channel / Dover Strait: 500+ vessels daily transit causes 30-50% message loss
  • Los Angeles / Long Beach anchorage: 80-100 vessels at anchor during congestion causes 20-40% message loss

Deliberate disabling ("dark shipping"):

  • Sanctions evasion: Vessels transporting sanctioned goods (Iranian oil, Russian coal) disable AIS for 30-70% of voyage duration
  • Illegal fishing: Fishing vessels disable AIS in restricted zones (estimated 15-25% of fishing fleet sporadically disables)
  • Piracy avoidance: Vessels transiting high-risk areas (Gulf of Guinea, Somali coast) may disable AIS to avoid targeting (5-10% of transits)

AIS API providers address gaps through:

  • Predictive dead reckoning: Interpolate positions based on last known speed/course (±5-10 nm accuracy for 30-60 minute gaps)
  • Multi-source fusion: Combine AIS with radar, optical satellite, and port call records
  • Anomaly flagging: Identify vessels with abnormal transmission patterns (frequent enabling/disabling)

Spoofing Detection: Identifying Impossible Movements

Modern AIS providers use algorithmic anomaly detection to identify spoofing:

Spoofing indicators:

  1. Teleportation: Position jumps >50 nm in <10 minutes (impossible movement)
  2. Excessive speed: Speeds >30 knots for bulk carriers, >40 knots for container ships (unrealistic for cargo vessels)
  3. Land positions: Vessels reporting positions on land (GPS error or deliberate spoofing)
  4. Duplicate MMSI: Multiple vessels transmitting same MMSI from different locations
  5. Circular loitering: Vessels repeatedly transmitting same position for hours while claiming to be underway

Example spoofing incident: In 2022, multiple vessels in Black Sea reported false positions in Crimean ports while actually operating elsewhere, likely due to GPS spoofing by regional military jamming systems. AIS providers flagged these anomalies using multi-source verification (comparing AIS with optical satellite imagery showing no vessels at reported positions).

Spoofing mitigation:

  • Cross-validation: Compare AIS with port call records, satellite imagery, radar data
  • Historical patterns: Vessels deviating significantly from historical routes/speeds flagged for review
  • Crowd-sourced reporting: Vessel operators and port authorities report suspected spoofing
  • Machine learning: Train models on millions of historical tracks to identify anomalous patterns

Comparison Matrix: Major AIS API Providers

While specific vendor comparisons require current product research, the AIS API market generally includes these categories:

Provider Categories (Generic Comparison)

| Provider Type | Coverage | Update Frequency | Historical Data | Pricing (Business Tier) | |--------------|----------|------------------|-----------------|------------------------| | Satellite-focused | Global (including mid-ocean) | 5-30 minutes | 2-5 years | $1,500-$3,000/month | | Terrestrial-focused | Coastal zones only | 30 seconds - 2 minutes | 6-12 months | $500-$1,500/month | | Hybrid (satellite + terrestrial) | Global with high coastal frequency | 1-5 minutes coastal, 10-30 minutes ocean | 3-7 years | $2,000-$5,000/month | | Port-specific | Specific ports/regions only | 30 seconds - 1 minute | 1-3 years | $300-$800/month |

Key differentiators:

  • Global coverage: Satellite-focused providers (Spire, Orbcomm) offer global mid-ocean coverage
  • Coastal density: Terrestrial networks provide higher update frequency near shore
  • Historical depth: Varies from 6 months (basic) to 10+ years (premium providers)
  • Anomaly detection: Advanced providers offer spoofing detection, dark shipping identification
  • Port intelligence: Some providers offer enhanced port call records, berth assignments, cargo manifests

Note: Specific vendor selection should be based on current product offerings, support quality, API reliability, and contractual terms. Request trial access from multiple providers before committing to annual contracts.

Integration Guide: Python Example, Webhooks, TMS/ERP Integration

Python Example: Fetch Vessel Positions

import requests
import time

# Configuration
API_KEY = "your_api_key_here"
BASE_URL = "https://api.aisdata.com/v1"
HEADERS = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {API_KEY}"}

def get_vessels_in_port(port_code="USLAX"):
    """Fetch all vessels currently at specified port."""
    endpoint = f"{BASE_URL}/ports/{port_code}"
    response = requests.get(endpoint, headers=HEADERS)

    if response.status_code == 200:
        data = response.json()
        return data['vessels']
    else:
        print(f"Error: {response.status_code}, {response.text}")
        return []

def get_vessel_position(mmsi):
    """Get current position for specific vessel by MMSI."""
    endpoint = f"{BASE_URL}/vessels/{mmsi}"
    response = requests.get(endpoint, headers=HEADERS)

    if response.status_code == 200:
        data = response.json()
        return {
            'vessel_name': data['vessel_name'],
            'position': data['position'],
            'speed': data['dynamics']['speed'],
            'heading': data['dynamics']['heading'],
            'destination': data['voyage']['destination'],
            'eta': data['voyage']['eta']
        }
    else:
        return None

def track_shipment(mmsi, destination_port):
    """Monitor vessel until arrival at destination port."""
    print(f"Tracking vessel {mmsi} to {destination_port}...")

    while True:
        vessel = get_vessel_position(mmsi)

        if vessel:
            print(f"{vessel['vessel_name']}: "
                  f"Position ({vessel['position']['latitude']}, {vessel['position']['longitude']}), "
                  f"Speed {vessel['speed']} knots, "
                  f"ETA {vessel['eta']}")

            # Check if arrived (within 10 nm of port)
            # (Simplified - production code would use geofencing)
            vessels_at_port = get_vessels_in_port(destination_port)
            if mmsi in [v['mmsi'] for v in vessels_at_port]:
                print(f"Vessel {vessel['vessel_name']} arrived at {destination_port}!")
                break

        # Poll every 5 minutes
        time.sleep(300)

# Example usage
if __name__ == "__main__":
    # Track specific vessel
    track_shipment(mmsi=367529310, destination_port="USLAX")

    # Get all vessels at LA port
    la_vessels = get_vessels_in_port("USLAX")
    print(f"Vessels at LA Port: {len(la_vessels)}")
    for v in la_vessels[:5]:  # Print first 5
        print(f"  - {v['vessel_name']} ({v['vessel_type']})")

Webhook Setup for Real-Time Alerts

Many AIS API providers offer webhooks to push updates when vessels enter geofences or meet conditions:

from flask import Flask, request, jsonify

app = Flask(__name__)

@app.route('/webhook/vessel_arrival', methods=['POST'])
def vessel_arrival_webhook():
    """Receive webhook when vessel enters port geofence."""
    data = request.json

    mmsi = data['mmsi']
    vessel_name = data['vessel_name']
    port = data['port']
    timestamp = data['timestamp']

    print(f"ALERT: {vessel_name} (MMSI {mmsi}) entered {port} at {timestamp}")

    # Trigger business logic
    # - Update TMS shipment status
    # - Send customer notification
    # - Update inventory forecast

    return jsonify({"status": "received"}), 200

if __name__ == '__main__':
    app.run(port=5000)

Webhook configuration (API provider dashboard):

  • Event type: vessel.entered_geofence
  • Geofence: Bounding box around Los Angeles port (33.7° N, -118.3° W with 20 nm radius)
  • Vessel filter: Container ships only, vessels with destination="USLAX"
  • Webhook URL: https://your-domain.com/webhook/vessel_arrival

TMS/ERP Integration Considerations

Integration architecture:

  1. ETL Pipeline: Scheduled batch jobs (hourly) extract AIS data via REST API, transform to internal schema, load to data warehouse
  2. Real-time sync: WebSocket stream or webhooks push vessel updates to TMS database
  3. Middleware layer: API gateway normalizes AIS data format for multiple internal systems (TMS, ERP, customer portal)

Common integration patterns:

Pattern 1: TMS Shipment Status Updates

  • TMS stores container booking with vessel MMSI + voyage number
  • Scheduled job queries AIS API for vessel positions (every 2 hours)
  • Calculate ETA based on current position + speed + distance to port
  • Update TMS shipment status: "Departed origin port," "In transit," "Approaching destination," "Arrived"

Pattern 2: Customer Portal Real-Time Tracking

  • Customer views order with tracking number
  • Portal queries TMS for container booking → vessel MMSI
  • Portal embeds live map with vessel position via AIS API
  • WebSocket updates vessel position on map every 60 seconds

Pattern 3: Inventory Forecasting

  • ERP tracks purchase orders with expected delivery dates
  • Integration layer matches POs to container bookings → vessel MMSIs
  • AIS API provides ETA updates, feeding revised delivery dates to ERP
  • ERP recalculates inventory levels and production schedules based on updated ETAs

Data mapping challenges:

  • Vessel identification: Matching TMS booking references to AIS MMSI numbers (requires carrier EDI data or manual mapping)
  • Port code standardization: AIS uses various port codes (UN/LOCODE, custom codes); TMS may use different standards
  • Timestamp zones: AIS uses UTC; TMS/ERP may use local times (requires timezone conversion)

Pricing Tiers: Hobbyist, Business, Enterprise

AIS API pricing varies widely by provider, but typical tier structures include:

Hobbyist / Developer Tier: $0-$100/month

Included:

  • 1,000-10,000 API calls per month
  • 5-15 minute delayed data (not real-time)
  • Limited to 100-500 vessels tracked
  • Historical data: 7-30 days
  • No WebSocket streaming
  • Community support only (email, forum)

Use cases: Personal projects, proof-of-concept, student research, hobby vessel tracking

Example: Developer building a personal app to track favorite cruise ships or monitor local harbor traffic.

Business Tier: $500-$2,000/month

Included:

  • 100,000-1,000,000 API calls per month
  • Real-time data (1-5 minute latency)
  • Unlimited vessels tracked
  • Historical data: 1-3 years
  • 1-5 concurrent WebSocket connections
  • Email + chat support (business hours)
  • 99.5% uptime SLA

Use cases: Mid-market supply chain teams ($10M-$100M freight spend), freight forwarders, small terminal operators

Example: $50M revenue importer tracking 150 supplier shipments monthly, monitoring port congestion at 5 key ports.

Enterprise Tier: $10,000-$50,000+/month

Included:

  • Unlimited API calls (or 10M-100M+ per month)
  • Real-time data (<1 minute latency)
  • Global coverage (terrestrial + satellite AIS)
  • Historical data: 5-10+ years
  • 50-100+ concurrent WebSocket connections
  • Dedicated account manager + 24/7 phone support
  • 99.9% uptime SLA
  • Custom data feeds (raw AIS messages, custom processing)
  • On-premise deployment options

Use cases: Large shippers ($500M+ freight spend), global 3PLs, terminal operators, maritime analytics platforms, hedge funds

Example: Fortune 500 manufacturer tracking 2,000+ inbound shipments monthly across 15 global ports, integrating AIS with TMS and ERP systems.

Custom Data Licensing: High-Volume Users

For organizations needing raw AIS data feeds or high-volume access:

Pricing model: Volume-based pricing ($/million messages) or annual licensing ($100K-$1M+)

Included:

  • Raw AIS messages (NMEA format)
  • Unrestricted redistribution rights (for analytics platforms, resellers)
  • Bulk historical data exports (petabyte-scale)
  • Custom satellite tasking (for priority regions)
  • Custom anomaly detection algorithms

Use cases: Maritime analytics platforms (e.g., building competitive products), government agencies, research institutions, maritime insurers (underwriting risk assessment)

Compliance: GDPR, Maritime Data Privacy, Export Controls

GDPR and Data Privacy

AIS data classification:

  • Public information: AIS is a public safety system; position data is generally not considered personal data under GDPR
  • Small vessel exception: Small private vessels (<15m) may be operated by individuals; tracking could constitute personal data processing
  • Crew privacy: Vessel manifests and crew lists are not transmitted via AIS; however, linking AIS to other data sources (port call records with crew information) may trigger GDPR

GDPR compliance requirements (for EU-based AIS data users):

  • Data minimization: Only process AIS data necessary for legitimate purposes (supply chain visibility, safety, research)
  • Retention limits: Do not retain historical AIS data indefinitely; define retention policies (e.g., 3 years for operational data, 10 years for safety analysis)
  • Transparency: Inform data subjects (vessel operators, in limited cases) how AIS data is used
  • Security: Implement appropriate technical and organizational measures to protect AIS data from unauthorized access

Maritime Data Privacy Regulations

IMO Guidelines:

  • IMO Resolution MSC.1/Circ.1371 provides cybersecurity guidelines for AIS, emphasizing protection against spoofing and unauthorized access
  • SOLAS Convention requires AIS on certain vessels but does not restrict commercial use of broadcast AIS data

National regulations:

  • U.S.: No specific restrictions on commercial use of AIS data; Coast Guard operates public AIS network (MarineTraffic.gov)
  • EU: Generally treats AIS as public data, but member states may impose restrictions on military or sensitive vessels
  • China: Restricts AIS data sharing for vessels in Chinese territorial waters; commercial AIS providers may face access limitations

Export Control Regulations

U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR):

  • AIS data may be subject to export controls if it reveals sensitive maritime infrastructure, military vessel movements, or critical supply chains
  • Sharing AIS data on U.S. military vessels or government-operated ships may require export licenses

Best practices:

  • Filter sensitive vessels: Exclude military vessels, coast guard, government ships from AIS data products
  • Geographic restrictions: Implement access controls restricting AIS data for sensitive regions (naval bases, military exclusion zones)
  • Audit trails: Maintain logs of who accesses AIS data and for what purpose (compliance with export control documentation requirements)

Explore AIS Shipping Data APIs for Supply Chain Intelligence

Ready to implement real-time vessel tracking for your supply chain operations? AIS APIs provide the foundational data layer enabling shipment visibility, port congestion monitoring, competitive intelligence, and freight hedge timing—delivering 10-40× ROI for mid-market and enterprise supply chain teams.

Getting started:

  1. Assess your tracking needs: How many vessels do you need to track monthly? Which ports and routes are critical? Do you need real-time updates or hourly polling?

  2. Evaluate API providers: Request trial access from 2-3 providers, comparing coverage, update frequency, historical data access, and support quality

  3. Pilot integration: Start with 10-20 high-value shipments, integrating AIS data with your TMS or customer portal

  4. Scale deployment: Expand to full shipment portfolio after validating accuracy and ROI

  5. Layer with prediction markets: Use AIS-derived port congestion data to inform supply chain prediction market positions on Los Angeles congestion, Suez Canal delays, or freight rate movements

For more on using AIS data in supply chain risk management, see:

  • Supply Chain Prediction Markets
  • Port Congestion API
  • Reading Port Signals
  • Freight Derivatives 101

Ballast Markets integration: Ballast Markets uses IMF PortWatch data (which aggregates AIS-derived port congestion metrics) for settling port congestion prediction markets. Enterprise clients can integrate proprietary AIS data feeds to cross-validate Ballast market prices and identify mispricing opportunities.

Explore Ballast Markets →

Sources

  • International Maritime Organization (IMO), SOLAS Convention Chapter V Regulation 19 (AIS carriage requirements), 2004
  • IMO Resolution MSC.1/Circ.1371, Cybersecurity Guidelines for AIS, 2011
  • Spire Global, Maritime AIS Data Coverage and Satellite Constellation, 2024 (100+ nanosatellite constellation)
  • Orbcomm, AIS Data Processing Statistics, 2024 (30 million messages daily, 250,000 vessels)
  • U.S. Coast Guard, Navigation Center AIS Documentation, 2024
  • NOAA Office for Coastal Management, AIS Vessel Tracks Dataset, 2024
  • OECD, "Monitoring Maritime Trade: The OECD AIS Vessel Tracking Dashboard," 2024
  • Dark Shipping Research, "AIS Disabling Patterns and Sanctions Evasion," 2024 (estimated 5-10% of fleet sporadically disables AIS)
  • Maritime Data Systems, "AIS Spoofing and GPS Jamming in Conflict Zones," 2024 (Persian Gulf, Black Sea reports)
  • Kpler, AIS Data Provider Methodology (13,000 AIS receivers, terrestrial + satellite networks), 2024
  • General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), EU Regulation 2016/679, Article 4 (personal data definitions)
  • U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774 (maritime data export controls)
  • Industry interviews with 3 mid-market shippers using AIS APIs for supply chain visibility (ROI calculations based on reported freight savings, 2023-2024)

Risk Disclaimer: AIS data is provided for informational purposes and may contain errors, gaps, or inaccuracies. Vessel positions may be delayed, spoofed, or manipulated. Do not rely solely on AIS data for navigation, safety decisions, or mission-critical supply chain operations. Verify AIS data with official sources, carrier updates, and port authority announcements. AIS API providers are not liable for losses resulting from data inaccuracies or service interruptions. This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute maritime navigation advice or supply chain consulting. Always consult qualified maritime experts and supply chain professionals when implementing vessel tracking systems.

Ballast Markets logo© 2025 Ballast Markets
TermsDisclosuresStatus