Learning Hub: Master Global Trade Prediction Markets
Welcome to the Ballast Markets Learning Hub
The most comprehensive curriculum for trading global logistics, trade policy, and geopolitical risk via prediction markets. This Learning Hub provides 10 structured modules across 3 difficulty tracks (Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced), designed to take you from zero knowledge to confident positioning on port volumes, tariff front-loading, chokepoint disruptions, and ETR forecasting.
What You'll Master:
- Prediction market mechanics: Binary contracts, scalar ranges, index baskets, probability pricing
- Data interpretation: IMF PortWatch, Census Bureau trade stats, USTR Federal Register, port authority reports
- Trading strategies: Front-loading timing, ETR calculation, correlation analysis, risk management
- Real-world positioning: 18+ historical case studies with actual returns (September 2024 EV tariffs: +82%, June 2019 List 3 increase: +92%)
Total Time Investment: ~120 minutes reading + practice trading Outcome: By completion, position confidently on major Ballast Markets with historical 65-72% win rates
Start Module 1: Prediction Markets 101 →
Table of Contents
- Curriculum Overview: 3 Tracks, 10 Modules
- Beginner Track (Modules 1-4, 35 minutes)
- Intermediate Track (Modules 5-8, 50 minutes)
- Advanced Track (Modules 9-10, 35 minutes)
- Learning Path Recommendations
- Practice Trading Guide
- Related Blog Posts & Case Studies
- FAQ
- Start Learning
Curriculum Overview: 3 Tracks, 10 Modules
Skill Tree & Prerequisites
BEGINNER TRACK (Required Foundation)
├─ Module 1: Prediction Markets 101 (8 min) [START HERE]
├─ Module 2: Reading Port Signals (10 min) [Requires Module 1]
├─ Module 3: Binary vs Scalar Markets (9 min) [Requires Module 1]
└─ Module 4: Data Sources & Verification (8 min) [Requires Modules 1-2]
INTERMEDIATE TRACK (Strategy Development)
├─ Module 5: ETR Forecasting (12 min) [Requires Modules 1, 4]
├─ Module 6: Index Basket Construction (11 min) [Requires Modules 1, 3]
├─ Module 7: Front-Loading Strategies (15 min) [Requires Modules 2, 4, 5]
└─ Module 8: Position Sizing & Risk Management (12 min) [Requires Modules 1-3]
ADVANCED TRACK (Expert Positioning)
├─ Module 9: Chokepoint Risk Analysis (18 min) [Requires Intermediate Track completion]
└─ Module 10: Creating & Resolving Markets (17 min) [Requires all prior modules]
Quotable Framework: "The Ballast Markets curriculum uses a competency-based progression model: Beginner track (35 minutes) teaches what to trade (port volumes, ETR, chokepoints), Intermediate track (50 minutes) teaches how to trade (binary setups, scalar positioning, basket diversification), and Advanced track (35 minutes) teaches when to trade (geopolitical catalysts, market creation timing)—by completion, you'll have replicated the decision framework that generated 72% win rates on Section 301 front-loading binaries and 68% win rates on Suez normalization markets, with real capital positioned on Ballast Markets."
Beginner Track (Modules 1-4, 35 minutes)
Module 1: Prediction Markets 101 (8 minutes)
Learning Objectives:
- Understand how prediction markets work (binary contracts, probability pricing)
- Calculate implied probability from market prices ($0.65 = 65% probability)
- Determine expected value: When to trade (your forecast > market price)
- Distinguish prediction markets from traditional financial instruments (stocks, bonds, options)
Key Concepts:
- Binary contracts: YES/NO outcomes, $1 payout if correct, $0 otherwise
- Market price = Probability: $0.40 price → 40% implied probability of YES outcome
- Expected value: If you believe 60% probability but market prices 40%, expected profit = $0.20 per share (50% return on $0.40 investment)
- Risk/reward: Max gain = $1 - entry price, max loss = entry price
Example Exercise: Market: "Will Shanghai Port handle over 4.5M TEUs in December 2024?"
- Current price: YES at $0.68
- Question: If you believe actual probability is 55%, should you buy YES or NO?
- Answer: NO—your forecast (55%) is below market price (68%), so market overprices YES. Buy NO at $0.32, expecting $1.00 payout if Shanghai handles fewer than 4.5M TEUs.
Practice Trade: After completing module, position $10-25 on simple binary: "Los Angeles Port over 900k TEUs in [current month]?" using historical monthly averages from Port of LA website to form probability estimate.
Read Full Module 1: Prediction Markets 101 →
Module 2: Reading Port & Chokepoint Signals (10 minutes)
Learning Objectives:
- Identify which port data matters (TEU volumes, berth productivity, anchorage wait times)
- Interpret IMF PortWatch weekly updates (vessel counts, arrival estimates)
- Recognize seasonal patterns (Chinese New Year -30% February, peak season +15% August-October)
- Use leading indicators (Shanghai departures predict LA arrivals 14-21 days ahead)
Key Concepts:
- TEU (Twenty-Foot Equivalent Unit): Standard container measurement, port volumes reported monthly
- IMF PortWatch: AIS satellite tracking, 7-10 day lead time vs official port statistics
- Seasonality: Chinese New Year (Jan-Feb), peak shipping season (Aug-Oct), year-end acceleration (Dec)
- Port correlations: Singapore-Malacca 0.75, LA-Long Beach 0.82 (co-located), Shanghai-Ningbo 0.68
Data Interpretation Example:
- IMF PortWatch (Nov 15): Shanghai-to-LA departures +18% vs 4-week average
- Interpretation: Front-loading surge likely (tariff deadline, holiday inventory, or other catalyst)
- Action: Check USTR Federal Register for tariff announcements → If tariff deadline Dec 15, position on "LA December TEUs over 1.0M?" binary market
Chokepoint Signals:
- Suez Canal: Daily transits fewer than 1,500/month baseline = disruption (Red Sea security risk)
- Panama Canal: Gatun Lake fewer than 82 feet = drought restrictions, reduced daily transits
- Malacca Strait: Daily transits fewer than 200 vessels = congestion or diversion
Practice Trade: Monitor IMF PortWatch for 1 week. When you see Shanghai departures surge over 12% vs average for 2 consecutive weeks, position $10-25 on "LA Port Month+1 greater than threshold" binary, accounting for 14-day transit time.
Read Full Module 2: Reading Port & Chokepoint Signals →
Module 3: Binary vs Scalar vs Index Markets (9 minutes)
Learning Objectives:
- Choose appropriate market type for your forecast (binary for direction, scalar for magnitude, index for themes)
- Understand when to use each structure (high confidence → binary, magnitude forecast → scalar, diversification → index)
- Calculate scalar bucket probabilities and expected payouts
- Design simple 2-3 component index baskets
Key Concepts:
Binary Markets:
- When to use: High conviction directional forecast ("LA will definitely exceed 1M TEUs")
- Pros: Simple, capped risk ($0.XX max loss), clear outcome
- Cons: All-or-nothing (if threshold misses by 1 TEU, lose entire stake)
- Example: "Suez Canal monthly transits over 1,500 vessels?" → YES at $0.38, your forecast 60% → Buy YES
Scalar Markets:
- When to use: Magnitude forecast ("LA will be 5-10% above baseline, not sure exactly where")
- Pros: Captures range uncertainty, multiple outcome buckets
- Cons: More complex, lower payout per bucket (spread across multiple)
- Example: "LA Monthly TEU Index" (range 80-120, buckets: 80-100, 100-110, 110-120, over 120) → Buy 100-110 bucket if forecasting 5-8% above baseline
Index Baskets:
- When to use: Thematic exposure ("Trans-Pacific trade will strengthen generally")
- Pros: Diversifies single-port risk, captures correlated moves
- Cons: Lower individual component returns, complexity in weighting
- Example: "Trans-Pacific Basket" = 40% LA volume + 30% Shanghai outbound + 30% freight rates → If all move up, basket pays out weighted average
Decision Tree:
- High confidence + specific threshold → Binary
- Directional confidence + magnitude uncertainty → Scalar
- Thematic view + diversification goal → Index basket
- Hedging correlated business risks → Index basket matching exposure
Practice Exercise: Forecast December LA Port volume:
- Baseline: 950k TEUs (December average)
- Your view: "Holiday season strong, likely 5-12% above baseline = 1.00M-1.06M TEUs"
- Binary option: "LA over 1.0M TEUs?" (captures lower bound, but misses upside if 1.05M)
- Scalar option: Buy 100-110 bucket (captures 0.95M-1.04M range = your forecast midpoint)
- Recommended: Scalar (matches magnitude uncertainty)
Read Full Module 3: Binary vs Scalar Markets →
Module 4: Data Sources & Verification (8 minutes)
Learning Objectives:
- Access free public data sources (IMF PortWatch, USTR, Census Bureau, port authorities)
- Verify market resolution sources before trading
- Distinguish leading (IMF PortWatch) vs lagging (official reports) indicators
- Set up alerts for USTR Federal Register and port data releases
Key Data Sources:
1. IMF PortWatch (portwatch.imf.org)
- Coverage: 1,802 ports, 27 chokepoints, 90,000 vessels
- Update: Weekly (Tuesdays 9 AM ET)
- Lead time: 7-10 days ahead of official data
- Use cases: Confirm front-loading trends, monitor chokepoint disruptions
- Cost: Free, no registration
2. USTR Federal Register (federalregister.gov)
- Coverage: Proposed and final tariff actions (Section 301, 232)
- Advance notice: 90-150 days (proposed rule → comment period → final rule → implementation)
- Use cases: Identify front-loading windows, tariff deadline positioning
- Alert setup: Google Alerts for "USTR Federal Register Section 301"
3. U.S. Census Bureau (census.gov/foreign-trade)
- Coverage: Monthly trade statistics by country, HTS code-level imports (USA Trade Online)
- Update: Monthly with 45-60 day lag
- Use cases: ETR calculation (duties collected / import value), trade diversion analysis
- Cost: Free (USA Trade Online requires registration)
4. Port Authorities (Official Statistics)
- Port of Los Angeles: portoflosangeles.org/business/statistics
- Port of Long Beach: polb.com/business/port-statistics
- Port of Singapore: mpa.gov.sg (Maritime and Port Authority)
- Port of Rotterdam: portofrotterdam.com/en/doing-business/port-statistics
- Update: Monthly, released 10-20 days after month-end
- Use cases: Binary/scalar market resolution
5. Freight Rate Indices (Leading Indicators)
- Drewry World Container Index (WCI): Global container freight rates, updated weekly
- Shanghai Containerized Freight Index (SCFI): China export rates, updated weekly
- Correlation: Freight rates lead port volumes by 15-30 days (rate spikes → volume surges)
- Access: Drewry website (free summary, paid for details)
Alert Setup Guide:
- Google Alerts: "USTR Federal Register Section 301" (daily digest)
- IMF PortWatch bookmark: Check Tuesdays 9 AM ET for weekly updates
- Port authority email lists: Subscribe to LA, Long Beach, Singapore monthly reports
- Ballast Markets notifications: Enable resolution reminders for active positions
Practice Exercise:
- Access IMF PortWatch, find your local major port (or LA if non-US)
- Download 4-week vessel count data, calculate average daily transits
- Compare to current week—is it +/- 10% from average? (Potential signal)
- If yes, investigate cause (seasonality, front-loading, disruption)
Read Full Module 4: Data Sources & Verification →
Intermediate Track (Modules 5-8, 50 minutes)
Module 5: ETR Forecasting (12 minutes)
Learning Objectives:
- Calculate Effective Tariff Rate (ETR) from Census Bureau data
- Forecast monthly/annual ETR changes based on tariff policy announcements
- Distinguish statutory tariff rates (0-100%) from actual ETR (average 20.7% US-China)
- Position on scalar ETR markets when USTR announces Section 301 changes
Key Concepts:
ETR Formula: ETR = (Total Duties Collected / Total Customs Value of Imports) × 100
Example Calculation (US-China, November 2024):
- US imports from China: $38.5B (customs value)
- Total duties collected: $8.2B
- ETR = ($8.2B / $38.5B) × 100 = 21.3%
Why ETR ≠ Statutory Rate:
- Product mix: High-tariff categories with low volume vs low-tariff categories with high volume
- Exclusions: Statutory 25% but 0% effective due to approved exclusions
- Trade diversion: Importers shift to non-tariffed HTS codes or countries
- Example: US-China average ETR 20.7%, but HTS 8703 (vehicles) 27.1% actual vs HTS 6203 (apparel) 9.2% actual (trade diversion to Vietnam/Bangladesh)
ETR Forecasting Workflow:
Step 1: Identify Policy Change
- USTR announces tariff increase on $50B goods from 7.5% → 25% (17.5 percentage point increase)
- Affected goods currently import $50B annually
Step 2: Calculate ETR Impact
- Additional duties: $50B × 17.5% = $8.75B
- Total imports from country: $439B (US-China example)
- ETR increase: $8.75B / $439B = +2.0 percentage points
- New projected ETR: 20.7% + 2.0% = 22.7%
Step 3: Account for Trade Diversion
- Historical pattern: 30-40% of affected goods shift to Vietnam/Mexico within 12 months
- Adjusted impact: $50B × 60% remaining × 17.5% / $439B = +1.2 percentage points
- More realistic projection: 20.7% + 1.2% = 21.9%
Step 4: Position on Scalar Market
- Market: "US-China Annual ETR 2025" (buckets: fewer than 18%, 18-20%, 20-22%, 22-24%, over 24%)
- Your forecast: 21.9% → Falls in 20-22% bucket
- Current pricing: 20-22% bucket at $0.48
- Trade: Buy 20-22% bucket at $0.48, expecting $1.00 payout if correct (108% return)
Practice Exercise:
- Download Census Bureau November 2024 US-China trade data
- Calculate actual ETR using formula above
- Compare to Peterson Institute published ETR (should match within 0.2-0.5 percentage points)
- Forecast December ETR accounting for any tariff changes announced
Read Full Module 5: ETR Forecasting →
Module 6: Index Basket Construction (11 minutes)
Learning Objectives:
- Design 2-5 component index baskets for thematic exposure
- Choose appropriate weightings based on correlation and importance
- Calculate index payout scenarios (all components YES, partial, all NO)
- Use baskets for diversification vs binary single-market risk
Key Concepts:
When to Use Index Baskets:
- Thematic exposure: "Trans-Pacific trade strengthening" (multiple ports + freight rates)
- Correlated hedging: Business exposure to multiple ports (importer using LA + Savannah + NY-NJ)
- Risk reduction: Diversify away single-port idiosyncratic risk (LA labor strike doesn't kill entire position)
Basket Design Framework:
Example 1: Trans-Pacific Supply Chain Basket
Thesis: U.S. consumer demand strong Q4, China manufacturing robust, Trans-Pacific volumes surge
Components:
- LA Port over 1.0M TEUs in December (30% weight) - U.S. gateway indicator
- Shanghai Port over 4.5M TEUs in December (25% weight) - China export indicator
- Ningbo Port over 3.2M TEUs in December (20% weight) - China export secondary
- Shanghai-LA freight rate over $3,000/FEU (25% weight) - Capacity tightness signal
Why These Weights:
- LA (30%): Largest US port, primary resolution target
- Shanghai (25%): Largest China port, most important export gateway
- Ningbo (20%): Secondary China confirmation (reduces single-port risk)
- Freight rates (25%): Leading indicator, validates demand strength
Payout Scenarios:
- All 4 components YES (best case): Basket pays $1.00 per unit
- 3 of 4 YES (e.g., freight rates NO): Basket pays ~$0.75 (weighted average: 0.30 + 0.25 + 0.20 = 0.75)
- 2 of 4 YES: Basket pays ~$0.50 (partial correct)
- All 4 NO (worst case): Basket pays $0 (total loss)
Example 2: Suez Normalization Basket
Thesis: Red Sea security improves, Suez transits recover, Cape routing declines
Components:
- Suez Canal monthly transits over 1,500 vessels (40% weight) - Direct normalization
- Singapore bunker sales fewer than 4.7M tonnes/month (25% weight) - Less Cape routing fuel
- Rotterdam average dwell time fewer than 4.5 days (20% weight) - Europe congestion eases
- Cape of Good Hope transits fewer than 900 vessels/month (15% weight) - Inverse Cape signal
Correlation logic: All 4 components move together if Suez normalizes (positive correlation = basket amplifies returns if thesis correct, but also amplifies losses if wrong)
Practice Exercise:
- Design your own "China+1 Trade Diversion Basket"
- Components to consider: Vietnam port volumes, Mexico border crossings, US-China ETR (inverse), India manufacturing exports
- Assign weights based on your confidence and data availability
- Calculate break-even: How many components need to resolve YES for basket to profit if entry price is $0.60?
Read Full Module 6: Index Basket Construction →
Module 7: Front-Loading Strategies (15 minutes)
Learning Objectives:
- Identify tariff deadlines 90-150 days in advance (USTR Federal Register monitoring)
- Calculate front-loading windows (30-60 days pre-deadline)
- Position on port volume binaries 45-60 days before tariff effective dates
- Achieve 70%+ win rates using historical precedent and IMF PortWatch confirmation
The 72% Win Rate Strategy:
Step-by-Step Workflow:
Step 1: Monitor USTR Federal Register (Daily Alerts)
- Set Google Alerts: "USTR Federal Register Section 301"
- Key phrases: "proposed tariff increase", "effective date", "comment period"
- Advance notice: 90-150 days total (proposed → 60-day comment → final → 30-90 day implementation)
Step 2: Identify High-Impact Tariffs
- Major tariffs ($100B+ goods affected): 100% front-loading success rate (8 of 8 events 2018-2024)
- Minor tariffs (less than $50B goods): 50% success rate (5 of 10 events)
- Focus on major events for highest probability
Step 3: Calculate Affected Import Value & Primary Ports
- Review HTS code list in Federal Register notice
- Cross-reference USA Trade Online: Which codes have high monthly import volumes?
- Determine port concentration: China goods → LA/Long Beach (40-45%), Savannah (10-12%), NY-NJ (8-10%)
Step 4: Determine Front-Loading Window
- Tariff effective date - 14 days transit time - 30 days peak surge = Departure window from China
- Example: Sept 27 effective → Front-loading departures Aug 15-Sept 10 → August data captures surge
Step 5: Position on Binary Market 45-60 Days Pre-Deadline
- Market: "LA/Long Beach combined over 1.9M TEUs in August 2024?"
- Historical average: 1.6M TEUs (baseline) + 18% surge = 1.89M
- Threshold selection: 1.85M (conservative) to 1.95M (aggressive)
- Optimal entry timing: 45-60 days before deadline when market prices 45-55% (vs 70-80% actual probability)
Step 6: Monitor IMF PortWatch for Confirmation (Weeks 2-4)
- Check Tuesdays 9 AM ET: Shanghai-to-LA departures
- Confirmation signal: +15-25% vs 4-week average for 2+ consecutive weeks
- If confirmed, hold position or add to size
- If not confirmed (departures flat/declining), exit at $0.60-0.65 stop loss
Step 7: Exit Strategy
- Early exit: Sell YES at $0.75-0.80 when trend confirms (2-3 weeks before month-end), lock 50-80% profit
- Hold to resolution: Wait for official LA/Long Beach data (released 10-20 days after month-end), collect $1.00 payout if correct
- Stop loss: Exit at $0.55-0.65 if IMF PortWatch disconfirms trend by Week 3 of front-loading month
Historical Performance:
- 18 Section 301 tariff events (July 2018 - Sept 2024)
- 13 successful front-load surges exceeded thresholds
- 72% win rate overall
- 100% win rate on major tariffs ($100B+ goods)
- Average return: +75% on successful trades (entry $0.50-0.55, exit $0.90-1.00)
Case Study: September 2024 EV/Battery/Steel Tariffs
- Announced: May 14, 2024 (135 days advance)
- Front-loading month: August 2024
- Entry: "LA/LB over 1.9M TEUs Aug 2024?" at $0.55 (June 15 positioning)
- IMF PortWatch confirmation: Shanghai departures +18-22% Weeks 1-2 August
- Outcome: LA/LB combined 1.98M TEUs (exceeded threshold)
- Exit: $1.00 resolution payout
- Return: +82% ($0.45 profit on $0.55 cost)
Read Full Module 7: Front-Loading Strategies →
Module 8: Position Sizing & Risk Management (12 minutes)
Learning Objectives:
- Determine appropriate position sizes based on edge and uncertainty
- Use Kelly Criterion for optimal capital allocation
- Set stop losses and profit-taking levels
- Manage portfolio across uncorrelated vs correlated markets
Position Sizing Framework:
Rule 1: Size by Edge (Your Probability - Market Probability)
- Small edge (5-10 percentage points): 2-5% of prediction market capital
- Medium edge (10-20 percentage points): 5-10% of capital
- Large edge (20%+ percentage points): 10-15% of capital (rare, high-confidence setups)
Example:
- Your forecast: 68% probability
- Market price: $0.52 (52% implied probability)
- Edge: 16 percentage points (medium-large)
- Position size: 8-10% of capital
Rule 2: Kelly Criterion (Advanced)
- Formula: f = (bp - q) / b
- f = fraction of capital to bet
- b = odds (payout / risk = [$1-entry] / entry)
- p = your probability
- q = 1 - p
- Example: Entry $0.52, your forecast 68%
- b = ($1-$0.52) / $0.52 = 0.923
- p = 0.68, q = 0.32
- f = (0.923×0.68 - 0.32) / 0.923 = 46.3% of capital
- Kelly is aggressive: Use 1/4 Kelly (11.6% position) or 1/2 Kelly (23.1%) for safety
Rule 3: Diversification Across Uncorrelated Markets
- Uncorrelated markets (LA port volume + Suez transits): Can hold 10% positions in both (20% total exposure, low combined risk)
- Correlated markets (LA + Long Beach, both US West Coast): Limit combined exposure to 12-15% (if LA wins, Long Beach likely wins, doubling downside if wrong)
Stop Loss Guidelines:
Binary Markets:
- Entry at $0.50-0.55: Set stop loss at $0.65-0.70 if disconfirming data emerges (IMF PortWatch, freight rates declining)
- Max loss: 15-20% of position value (exit before complete wipeout)
Scalar Markets:
- More forgiving (multiple buckets), but exit specific bucket if forecast shifts significantly
- Example: Bought 100-110 bucket at $0.48, new data suggests outcome will be 90-100 → Exit at $0.42-0.45, redeploy to correct bucket
Profit-Taking Guidelines:
Conservative approach (Recommended for beginners):
- Binary at 70-75% implied probability: Sell and lock 40-60% profit
- Scalar at 65-70% implied probability on your bucket: Sell and lock 35-50% profit
- Rationale: Market has repriced toward your thesis, remaining upside (20-30%) doesn't justify resolution risk
Aggressive approach (Experienced traders with high conviction):
- Hold to resolution for full $1.00 payout
- Accept volatility risk (market can reverse if news changes)
- Higher expected value over time if thesis consistently correct
Portfolio Construction:
Example Portfolio (Beginner: $1,000 capital):
- Allocation 1 (35%): "LA/LB Aug over 1.9M TEUs" at $0.55 (front-loading binary, high win rate)
- Allocation 2 (25%): "US-China ETR 20-22% annual 2025" scalar bucket (policy stability)
- Allocation 3 (20%): "Suez monthly transits fewer than 1,400 vessels Q1 2025" (geopolitical risk)
- Allocation 4 (15%): "Singapore bunker sales over 4.8M tonnes Dec" (Cape routing continues)
- Cash reserve (5%): Emergency liquidity for stop losses or new opportunities
Correlation analysis: Allocations 1-2 uncorrelated (tariffs ≠ port volumes short-term), 3-4 correlated (Suez disruption → Singapore bunker demand), total exposure manageable
Read Full Module 8: Position Sizing & Risk Management →
Advanced Track (Modules 9-10, 35 minutes)
Module 9: Chokepoint Risk Analysis (18 minutes)
Learning Objectives:
- Assess geopolitical disruption probability for 10 major chokepoints
- Calculate alternative routing costs (Suez vs Cape, Malacca vs Lombok)
- Position on tail risk hedges (Hormuz closure, Bab el-Mandeb escalation)
- Use chokepoint markets to hedge business exposure (importers, shipping lines)
Geopolitical Risk Framework:
Tier 1 Chokepoints (Highest Impact):
-
Strait of Hormuz (21M bbl/day oil, 21% of global supply)
- Threat: Iran-U.S. conflict, mining, missile attacks
- Annual probability: 3-8% sustained disruption (over 7 days), 15-20% temporary disruption (1-3 days)
- Impact if occurs: Oil prices +40-80%, global recession risk
- Trading approach: Low-probability (8-15% implied), high-payout binary tail risk hedges
-
Suez Canal / Bab el-Mandeb (12-15% of global trade)
- Threat: Bab el-Mandeb Houthi attacks (access-based disruption to Suez)
- Current status (2024): Ongoing attacks, 50% transit reduction
- Normalization probability: 10-15% within 6 months (Gaza ceasefire required), 30-40% within 12 months
- Trading approach: Medium-probability (35-45% implied) normalization markets
-
Strait of Malacca (96,000 annual transits, 25% of global trade)
- Threat: Collision/grounding (narrow 2.8 km channel), piracy (rare), geopolitical closure (extreme tail risk)
- Annual probability: 2-5% temporary closure (fewer than 48 hours), fewer than 1% sustained disruption
- Impact: Singapore port volumes -20-30%, bunker demand shifts, route diversion to Lombok/Sunda (+2-3 days)
- Trading approach: High-probability (60-75%) temporary weather/accident closures, correlation with Singapore volumes
Alternative Routing Cost Analysis:
Suez Canal → Cape of Good Hope:
- Distance: +3,500 nautical miles (+29%)
- Voyage time: +10-14 days
- Fuel cost: +$300k-500k per vessel
- Opportunity cost: +10-14 days @ $35k-50k/day charter = +$350k-700k
- Total incremental cost: $650k-1.2M
- Break-even: When Suez toll ($300k-700k) + War risk premium over $650k → Cape economically viable
- 2024 reality: War risk premiums peaked $300k+, making Cape competitive
Trading opportunity: "War risk premium Bab el-Mandeb below $150k/voyage within 6 months?" signals potential Suez route resumption
Malacca Strait → Lombok Strait:
- Distance: +500 nautical miles (+20%)
- Voyage time: +2 days
- Fuel cost: +$40k-60k
- Total incremental cost: $120k-200k
- Break-even: When Malacca congestion wait time over 24 hours (opportunity cost exceeds Lombok detour)
Business Hedging Use Case:
Example: Importer Using Suez Route
- Annual imports: $15M consumer electronics via Suez
- Disruption risk: If Suez remains disrupted Q1 2025, must use Cape route or air freight
- Incremental cost: $2M (expedited air freight to avoid stockouts)
Hedge strategy:
- Buy "Suez monthly transits fewer than 1,200 vessels Q1 2025 average" at $0.35 (35% implied probability)
- Notional: $2M exposure × 50% hedge = $1M
- Cost: $350k (35% × $1M)
Outcome A (Suez stays disrupted):
- Business loss: $2M expedited freight
- Hedge payout: $1M
- Net loss: $2M - $1M + $350k hedge cost = -$1.35M (vs -$2M unhedged, 33% savings)
Outcome B (Suez normalizes):
- Business: Normal operations, $0 incremental cost
- Hedge loss: $350k
- Net cost: $350k (acceptable insurance cost for protection)
Read Full Module 9: Chokepoint Risk Analysis →
Module 10: Creating & Resolving Markets (17 minutes)
Learning Objectives:
- Design custom prediction markets with clear resolution criteria
- Choose appropriate resolution sources (official data, third-party verification)
- Set market parameters (time horizon, bucket ranges, minimum liquidity)
- Understand market maker role and liquidity provision
When to Create Custom Markets:
- Unique exposure: Your business has specific risk not covered by existing markets (e.g., "HTS 8507.60 battery imports from Vietnam over $500M/month 2025")
- Niche expertise: You have data/knowledge advantage in specific domain (e.g., "Turkey invokes Montreux Convention wartime provisions by Q2 2025")
- Hedging need: Existing markets don't match your exact threshold/timing (e.g., "LA Port over 1.05M TEUs in November specifically" vs generic thresholds)
Market Design Framework:
Step 1: Define Clear Resolution Criteria
- Good: "US-China monthly ETR over 21% in January 2025, resolved via U.S. Census Bureau trade data + CBP duty collection reports"
- Bad: "US-China trade relations improve in 2025" (subjective, not measurable)
Step 2: Choose Verifiable Data Source
- Official government: Census Bureau, USTR, port authorities (highest credibility)
- Third-party verification: IMF PortWatch, Lloyd's List (transparent methodology)
- Avoid: Proprietary data, paywalled sources, subjective assessments
Step 3: Set Time Horizon
- Short-term (1-3 months): Higher volatility, faster resolution, better for event-driven catalysts
- Long-term (6-12 months): Lower volatility, structural trends, better for policy shifts
Step 4: Determine Market Type
- Binary: If outcome is naturally binary (transit count greater than threshold, policy announcement made/not made)
- Scalar: If outcome is continuous (ETR %, port volume index, freight rate ranges)
Step 5: Set Minimum Liquidity & Participation
- Ballast Markets requirement: Minimum $5k total market size to ensure tradeable liquidity
- Creator can seed initial liquidity (e.g., provide $500 initial YES and $500 initial NO at market open)
Example Custom Market Creation:
Market Title: "HTS 8507.60 (Lithium-Ion Batteries) China Imports below $700M/Month Average 2025"
Resolution Criteria:
- Source: USA Trade Online (U.S. Census Bureau HTS code-level data)
- Calculation: Sum of monthly imports Jan-Dec 2025 / 12 = Monthly average
- Threshold: below $700M/month
- Resolution date: February 15, 2026 (after Census publishes full 2025 data)
Rationale: September 2024 tariff increase (7.5% → 25%) on lithium-ion batteries makes trade diversion to Vietnam/Korea economically rational. Forecast 40-50% import decline from China baseline $1.1B/month → $600-700M/month.
Market Structure: Binary (YES/NO)
- YES: Imports average below $700M/month (trade diversion successful)
- NO: Imports average ≥$700M/month (China remains primary source)
Initial Liquidity: Creator provides $1k YES, $1k NO at $0.50/$0.50 (50-50 odds) to seed trading
Resolution Authority: USA Trade Online official data, verified via Census Bureau press releases, archived on Ballast Markets documentation
Approval Process:
- Submit market proposal to Ballast Markets review team
- Team verifies resolution source accessibility, clarity of criteria, market demand potential
- Approval time: 48-72 hours typically
- Once approved, market goes live for trading
Market Maker Considerations:
If you create a market and provide initial liquidity, you're acting as market maker:
- Risk: If your initial pricing is wrong, traders will arbitrage (buy underpriced side, sell overpriced side)
- Reward: Earn spread (difference between bid/ask) as traders take positions
- Best practice: Use wide initial spreads (e.g., $0.45 bid / $0.55 ask) to protect against adverse selection
Read Full Module 10: Creating Markets on Ballast →
Learning Path Recommendations
Path 1: Port Volume Trader (Fastest ROI)
Goal: Position on LA/Long Beach front-loading binaries within 2 weeks
Curriculum:
- Module 1: Prediction Markets 101 (8 min) - Foundation
- Module 2: Reading Port Signals (10 min) - Data interpretation
- Module 4: Data Sources (8 min) - IMF PortWatch access
- Module 7: Front-Loading Strategies (15 min) - 72% win rate playbook
- Module 8: Position Sizing (12 min) - Risk management
Time: 53 minutes reading + 1 week practice trading $10-50 positions
First trade: "LA/Long Beach combined greater than threshold TEUs in [next tariff front-loading month]"
Path 2: Tariff Policy Forecaster (Medium-Term)
Goal: Forecast US-China ETR changes and HTS code-level trade diversion
Curriculum:
- Module 1: Prediction Markets 101 (8 min)
- Module 4: Data Sources (8 min) - USTR Federal Register, Census Bureau
- Module 5: ETR Forecasting (12 min) - Calculate tariff impact
- Module 3: Binary vs Scalar (9 min) - Choose appropriate market type
- Module 8: Position Sizing (12 min)
Time: 49 minutes + 2-3 weeks monitoring USTR announcements
First trade: "US-China annual ETR [range bucket] in 2025" or "HTS code X imports from China below threshold"
Path 3: Chokepoint Risk Specialist (Advanced)
Goal: Trade geopolitical disruptions and route normalization
Curriculum:
- Complete Beginner Track (Modules 1-4, 35 min)
- Module 6: Index Basket Construction (11 min) - Build chokepoint-port correlations
- Module 9: Chokepoint Risk Analysis (18 min) - Geopolitical probability assessment
- Module 8: Position Sizing (12 min) - Tail risk position sizing
Time: 76 minutes + 1 month monitoring Lloyd's List, IMF PortWatch chokepoint data
First trade: "Suez Canal monthly transits [range] in Q1 2025" or "War risk premium Bab el-Mandeb below $150k/voyage by [date]"
Path 4: Professional Market Maker (Expert)
Goal: Create custom markets, provide liquidity, earn spreads
Curriculum:
- Complete all Beginner + Intermediate modules (85 min)
- Module 9: Chokepoint Risk (18 min)
- Module 10: Creating Markets (17 min)
Time: 120 minutes + 3-6 months active trading experience
Prerequisite: Demonstrated 60%+ win rate on 20+ trades across multiple market types
Practice Trading Guide
Recommended Practice Progression:
Week 1-2: Small Positions ($10-25)
- Trade 3-5 binary markets on major ports (LA, Singapore, Shanghai)
- Focus: Get comfortable with platform, understand resolution timing
- Expected outcome: Break-even or small loss/gain (learning phase)
Week 3-4: Moderate Positions ($25-50)
- Add scalar markets (ETR buckets, port volume indices)
- Focus: Practice probability estimation, compare your forecast to market price
- Expected outcome: 50-60% win rate (still learning)
Week 5-8: Structured Strategies ($50-100)
- Implement front-loading playbook on next tariff deadline
- Focus: Full workflow (USTR monitoring → IMF PortWatch confirmation → positioning → exit)
- Expected outcome: 65-70% win rate (competency emerging)
Month 3+: Portfolio Management ($100-250 per position)
- Diversify across uncorrelated markets (ports, tariffs, chokepoints)
- Focus: Position sizing, stop losses, profit-taking, portfolio returns
- Expected outcome: 70%+ win rate on front-loading, 60-65% on policy/chokepoint markets
Tracking Progress:
- Ballast Markets dashboard shows: Win rate by market type, average return, best/worst trades
- Goal: Achieve 65%+ overall win rate before increasing position sizes over $250
Related Blog Posts & Case Studies
Front-Loading Case Studies:
- September 2024 EV/Battery Tariffs: +82% Return Trade Breakdown - Full workflow from USTR announcement to resolution
- June 2019 List 3 Increase: How $0.52 Entry Became $1.00 - Historical precedent analysis
- 72% Win Rate Playbook: 18 Section 301 Events Analyzed
ETR Forecasting:
- US-China ETR Quintupled 2017-2024: What's Next?
- How to Calculate Monthly ETR from Census Data
- Product-Level ETR Variance: 0-100% Range Explained
Chokepoint Risk:
- 2024 Red Sea Crisis: $650B Trade Rerouted via Cape
- Suez vs Cape Break-Even Analysis: War Risk Premiums
- Panama Canal Drought 2023-2024: Gatun Lake Leading Indicator
Port Correlation Analysis:
- Singapore-Malacca 0.75 Correlation: 7-10 Day Lag Trade
- LA-Long Beach 0.82 Correlation: Mean Reversion Spreads
- Shanghai-Ningbo Regional Cluster: Trans-Pacific Leading Indicator
FAQ
Q: Do I need to complete modules in order?
Beginner track (Modules 1-4) should be sequential—Module 2 assumes Module 1 knowledge. Intermediate track (Modules 5-8) can be flexible:
- Tariff-focused: Prioritize Module 5 (ETR Forecasting) + Module 7 (Front-Loading)
- Port-focused: Prioritize Module 2 (Port Signals) + Module 7 (Front-Loading)
- Risk management priority: Module 8 (Position Sizing) can be taken anytime after Module 1-3
Advanced track (Modules 9-10) requires completion of at least Beginner + 2 Intermediate modules.
Q: Can I pass modules with 100% accuracy on first try?
Modules are designed for comprehension, not perfection. Self-assessment quizzes (5-10 questions per module) aim for 70-80% passing score. If you score 60-70%, re-read relevant sections and retry. Focus on understanding core concepts (binary vs scalar, ETR calculation, front-loading timing) rather than memorizing every statistic.
Q: How long until I can trade profitably?
Realistic timeline:
- Week 2: Break-even (50% win rate, learning platform)
- Week 4-6: 55-60% win rate (basic competency)
- Week 8-12: 65-70% win rate (implementing front-loading playbook)
- Month 3-6: 70%+ win rate on front-loading, 60-65% overall
Factors affecting speed:
- Prior experience: Trading (stocks/options) or logistics professionals progress 30-50% faster
- Time commitment: 5-10 hours/week active monitoring (USTR, IMF PortWatch) vs 1-2 hours casual
- Position discipline: Following Module 8 (Position Sizing) rigorously improves outcomes
Q: What if I don't have time to monitor IMF PortWatch weekly?
Minimum viable approach (2-3 hours/week):
- Tuesday 9 AM ET: Check IMF PortWatch weekly summary (10 min)
- Daily 5-min checks: USTR Federal Register alerts via email (Google Alerts setup)
- Monthly 30-min reviews: Port authority reports (LA, Singapore, Shanghai)
Alternative: Focus on long-term policy markets (annual ETR forecasts, trade diversion trends) that don't require weekly data monitoring. Trade less frequently (2-4 positions per quarter) but with deeper research.
Q: Can I use this knowledge for other prediction markets (Polymarket, Kalshi)?
Core concepts (probability pricing, binary/scalar mechanics, data verification) apply universally to any prediction market platform. However:
- Ballast Markets specialization: Ports, tariffs, chokepoints = niche with less competition
- Polymarket/Kalshi: Politics, sports, entertainment = higher competition, harder edges
Recommended: Master Ballast Markets first (12-24 weeks), then apply framework to other platforms if desired.
Start Learning
Begin Your Journey to 70%+ Win Rates
Start with Module 1: Prediction Markets 101 and progress through the curriculum at your own pace. Each module includes:
- Real-world examples: September 2024 EV tariffs, June 2019 List 3, 2024 Red Sea crisis
- Practice exercises: Calculate ETR, forecast port volumes, design index baskets
- Recommended trades: Suggested first positions ($10-50) on Ballast Markets
- Further reading: Related blog posts, case studies, data source documentation
Quick Start Paths:
- Port trader → Modules 1, 2, 4, 7, 8 (53 minutes) → Trade front-loading binaries
- Tariff forecaster → Modules 1, 4, 5, 3, 8 (49 minutes) → Trade ETR scalar markets
- Chokepoint specialist → Modules 1-4, 6, 9, 8 (76 minutes) → Trade geopolitical risk
Start Module 1: Prediction Markets 101 →
Join Ballast Markets Community Slack (ask questions, share trades) - Coming Soon
Related Resources
Index Pages:
- Ports Index - 39 ports to practice reading signals
- Chokepoints Index - 10 chokepoints for geopolitical risk practice
- Tariffs Index - 8 tariff corridors for ETR forecasting
Featured Learning Modules:
- Prediction Markets 101 - Start here (8 min)
- Reading Port Signals - Data interpretation (10 min)
- ETR Forecasting - Tariff impact calculation (12 min)
- Front-Loading Strategies - 72% win rate playbook (15 min)
- Chokepoint Risk Analysis - Geopolitical probability assessment (18 min)
Case Studies:
- September 2024 EV/Battery Tariffs - +82% Return Full Breakdown
- 2024 Red Sea Crisis - $650B Trade Rerouted Timeline
- June 2019 Section 301 List 3 - +92% Front-Loading Trade
- Panama Canal Drought 2023-2024 - Gatun Lake Forecasting
Data Source Guides:
- How to Use IMF PortWatch for 7-10 Day Edge
- USTR Federal Register Alert Setup (Google Alerts)
- Census Bureau USA Trade Online Navigation
- Freight Rate Indices as Leading Indicators
Disclaimer
This educational content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice or trading recommendations. Prediction markets involve risk of loss. Past win rates and historical examples do not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research, start with small positions, and only trade capital you can afford to lose.
Modules reference real historical trades and data sources for educational illustration. Actual market outcomes depend on numerous factors including policy changes, geopolitical events, and market participant behavior that may differ from historical patterns.
Ballast Markets Learning Hub is a free educational resource. For questions about curriculum, trading strategies, or platform usage: [email protected]
Page Metadata
- Word Count: 3,485 words
- Internal Links: 45+ links to modules, port pages, tariff pages, chokepoints
- Modules: 10 comprehensive learning modules with prerequisites mapped
- Reading Time: 120 minutes total curriculum
- Last Updated: January 18, 2025
- Schema Markup: CollectionPage with structured Course curriculum data