5 Chokepoints That Move Global Trade

When a single ship wedged itself sideways in the Suez Canal for six days in March 2021, it didn't just make headlines. The Ever Given blockage delayed an estimated $9-10 billion in daily trade, stranded over 400 vessels, and sent shockwaves through supply chains from Rotterdam to Shanghai. That incident underscored a fundamental reality of global commerce: a handful of narrow maritime passages control the flow of 60% of world trade.

For traders monitoring global supply chains, these chokepoints aren't just geographic features. They're concentrated risk nodes where weather, geopolitics, infrastructure failures, and policy decisions converge to create measurable, tradeable volatility. In 2024 alone, we witnessed dramatic disruptions across multiple chokepoints: Houthi attacks forced a 50% decline in Suez Canal traffic, Panama's drought cut daily transits by 40%, and geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz kept oil risk premiums elevated.

This comprehensive guide examines the five most critical maritime chokepoints, how they shaped trade patterns in 2024, and how prediction markets allow you to trade disruption risk, normalization timelines, and routing economics.

Why Chokepoints Matter for Traders

Maritime chokepoints are narrow passages where geography forces shipping traffic into concentrated corridors. Unlike open ocean routes where vessels can disperse across hundreds of miles, chokepoints create bottlenecks with three tradeable characteristics:

Binary risk profiles: Vessels either transit successfully or divert to much longer alternative routes. This creates clean threshold-based markets: "Will Suez Canal daily transits exceed 75 vessels in January?" or "Will Panama Canal implement additional draft restrictions?"

Price-sensitive routing decisions: Every chokepoint has an economic break-even calculation. When Suez Canal war risk premiums exceeded $250,000 per voyage in early 2024, carriers switched to Cape of Good Hope routing despite adding 10-14 days. These calculations are transparent and predictable, enabling traders to forecast routing shifts before they appear in official statistics.

Cascading effects across supply chains: A disruption at one chokepoint ripples outward. Reduced Suez transits meant increased bunker fuel demand in Singapore, European port congestion from Cape-routed vessels, and Asia-Europe freight rate volatility. Index basket strategies let you capture these correlations.

Let's examine each of the five major chokepoints that moved markets in 2024.

1. Strait of Malacca: Asia's Indispensable Gateway

Location: Between Malaysia's Malay Peninsula and Indonesia's Sumatra island Width at narrowest point: 2.8 kilometers (1.5 nautical miles) Annual traffic: 90,000+ vessels (2024 estimate) Cargo types: Crude oil (15.7 million barrels/day), LNG, containers, dry bulk

Why It Matters

The Strait of Malacca is the world's busiest chokepoint by vessel count and the shortest route between the Indian and Pacific Oceans. It connects Middle Eastern oil suppliers with Asian consumers (China, Japan, South Korea), European container exports with Southeast Asian manufacturers, and Australian commodity exports with global markets.

25% of globally traded oil passes through Malacca, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. For context, that's more than triple Panama Canal's oil throughput and nearly double Suez's. China alone imports 80% of its crude oil via Malacca, creating strategic dependency that drives Chinese investment in alternative routes like Pakistan's Gwadar Port and Myanmar pipelines.

2024 Developments

Unlike Panama and Suez, Malacca experienced relative stability in 2024. Piracy incidents remained low (fewer than 10 reported vs. 150+ annually in the 2000s), aided by coordinated patrols from Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia. However, several factors kept Malacca in traders' focus:

China's "Malacca Dilemma" hedging: Beijing continued investing in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor and Myanmar oil pipelines to reduce dependency. These projects, while years from completion, signal long-term diversification away from exclusive Malacca reliance.

Singapore bunker demand surge: With ships avoiding Suez and taking longer Cape routes, Singapore's bunker fuel sales increased 6% to 54.92 million tonnes in 2024. Malacca serves as the gateway to Singapore, making bunker demand a proxy for broader routing patterns.

Environmental regulations: The International Maritime Organization's tightened sulfur emission standards (implemented 2020) continue driving vessels toward compliant fuel sources. Singapore's position as Malacca's bunkering hub benefits from this trend.

LNG traffic growth: Asian LNG demand, particularly from China and South Korea, drove increased LNG carrier traffic through Malacca. This created tradeable opportunities in LNG freight rates and Singapore port throughput.

Trading Strategies

Binary markets: "Will monthly Malacca transits exceed 7,500 vessels?" Resolution via IMF PortWatch satellite tracking. Baseline normal is 7,200-7,800 monthly transits.

Scalar markets: "Singapore Bunker Sales Index — Q1 2025" (range 48-58 million tonnes annually). Bunker demand correlates with Malacca traffic and serves as proxy for global shipping activity.

Correlation plays: Long Malacca throughput + short Sunda Strait traffic. When Malacca flows normally, alternative routes see less traffic. Spread narrows during disruptions.

Geopolitical hedges: "Will China announce major Malacca bypass infrastructure milestone by Q2 2025?" Low probability, high payout bet on strategic diversification accelerating.

2. Suez Canal: The Red Sea Crisis

Location: Egypt, connecting Mediterranean Sea and Red Sea Length: 193 kilometers Annual traffic: 20,000+ vessels pre-2024; ~10,000-12,000 in 2024 Cargo types: Containers, crude oil, LNG, dry bulk

Why It Matters

The Suez Canal saves vessels 6,000+ kilometers compared to routing around Africa via Cape of Good Hope. Pre-2024, it handled 12-15% of global trade volume and was the primary artery for Europe-Asia container shipping. Maersk, MSC, and CMA CGM—controlling 45% of global container capacity—relied on Suez for their most profitable Asia-Europe services.

The canal generates $8-9 billion annually in tolls for Egypt, constituting 2-3% of the country's GDP. Prolonged volume declines strain fiscal stability, creating sovereign risk dimensions beyond pure shipping economics.

2024 Disruptions

Starting November 2023, Houthi forces launched drone and missile attacks on commercial vessels transiting the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb Strait, Suez's southern gateway. Major carriers suspended Suez routing. Container traffic plummeted 80%+ in early 2024, with overall volumes down 50% year-over-year.

War risk insurance premiums surged 500%, from approximately $50,000 per voyage to over $300,000 for high-value container ships. Combined with Bab el-Mandeb security concerns, this made Cape routing economically viable despite adding 10-14 days and 3,500 nautical miles.

Shanghai-Rotterdam container rates spiked to $5,200 per forty-foot equivalent unit (FEU) in May 2024, compared to $1,800 pre-disruption. This 189% increase reflected tighter vessel capacity as ships took longer routes, reducing available slots.

Cape-routed vessels discharge at Rotterdam, Antwerp-Bruges, and Hamburg, creating European port congestion. Rotterdam's average dwell time increased 18% in Q2 2024 compared to Q1, per IMF PortWatch data.

Trading Opportunities

Binary markets: "Will Suez Canal monthly transits exceed 1,800 vessels in March 2025?" This represents partial normalization (60 vessels/day vs. pre-crisis 65-70/day).

Scalar markets: "War Risk Premium Index — Q1 2025" (range 0-600 basis points, where 0 = $50k baseline, 600 = $350k). Mean reversion opportunity if conflict de-escalates.

Freight rate spreads: "Shanghai-Rotterdam Premium vs Shanghai-Los Angeles" (Suez route vs Trans-Pacific). Narrowing spread signals Suez normalization.

Index baskets: Long Suez transits + short Rotterdam congestion + short Singapore bunker demand. Captures multi-dimensional normalization when carriers resume Suez routing.

Related reading: The Red Sea Crisis: From Houthi Attacks to Cape Routing

3. Panama Canal: Drought and Climate Risk

Location: Panama, connecting Atlantic and Pacific Oceans Length: 82 kilometers (51 miles) Annual traffic: 14,000-15,000 vessels (pre-drought); ~10,000 in 2024 Cargo types: Containers (32%), dry bulk (21%), LNG (16%), vehicle carriers

Why It Matters

The Panama Canal eliminates 8,000-13,000 nautical miles for vessels traveling between East Asia and the U.S. East Coast or between the U.S. West Coast and Europe. It handles roughly 6% of global trade by volume, with particular importance for:

U.S. East Coast container imports: 46% of Los Angeles/Long Beach import cargo could theoretically route through Panama to reach East Coast consumers faster and cheaper than all-water routes via Suez.

LNG exports from the U.S. Gulf: Panama connects Cheniere Energy's Louisiana terminals with Asian LNG buyers. In 2023, 32% of U.S. LNG exports transited Panama.

Agricultural commodities: Grain exports from U.S. Midwest to Asia frequently use Panama, as do South American soybean and copper exports heading to China.

2023-2024 Drought Crisis

Panama Canal operations depend entirely on freshwater from Gatun Lake, which provides the 101 million liters needed to operate locks for each vessel transit. The canal is a "water elevator" system, not a sea-level channel like Suez.

2023 saw the driest year in over a century for the Panama Canal watershed. Gatun Lake levels dropped to critical lows, forcing the Panama Canal Authority (ACP) to implement progressive restrictions:

By early 2024, vessels faced 7-14 day queues or paid exorbitant premiums. Carriers diverted to Suez (for Asia-Europe routes) or U.S. intermodal rail (East Coast imports landed at LA/Long Beach, then railed east).

LNG carriers particularly affected: With 16% of traffic, LNG vessels compete for limited slots. Some U.S. LNG cargoes rerouted around Cape Horn (South America's tip), adding 30+ days.

Recovery Timeline

Late 2024 saw improved rainfall and Gatun Lake recovery. By October 2024, daily transits increased to 30, with ACP projecting return to 34-36 by Q2 2025. However, climate models predict recurring drought cycles, making Panama structurally vulnerable.

Trading Strategies

Binary markets: "Will Panama Canal daily transits average ≥34 in February 2025?" Resolution via official ACP data. Measures normalization progress.

Scalar markets: "Gatun Lake Elevation Index — Monthly Average" (range 79-86 feet, where 85+ feet enables full operations). Direct exposure to water supply, leading indicator for transit capacity.

Freight rate arbitrage: "U.S. Gulf-Asia LNG freight premium vs Atlantic Basin" (Panama route vs alternatives). Premium above $5/mmBtu signals sustained Panama constraints.

Seasonal plays: "Will Panama Canal implement new draft restrictions between May-September 2025?" Dry season (January-April) creates predictable risk windows.

Related reading: Panama Canal Drought: What Traders Need to Know

4. Strait of Hormuz: Oil's Geopolitical Pressure Point

Location: Between Iran and Oman, connecting Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman Width at narrowest point: 33 kilometers (21 nautical miles) Annual traffic: 21,000+ oil tankers Cargo: 21 million barrels/day of crude oil and petroleum products (2024)

Why It Matters

The Strait of Hormuz is the world's most important oil chokepoint by volume. 21 million barrels per day represents roughly 21% of global petroleum consumption, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Saudi Arabia, Iraq, UAE, Kuwait, and Qatar—collectively holding over 30% of global proven oil reserves—depend on Hormuz for exports.

If Hormuz closed for even one week, global oil prices would likely spike 20-40% based on historical analogues (1980s Iran-Iraq War, 2019 tanker attacks). Strategic Petroleum Reserves in the U.S., China, and IEA members provide only 30-60 days of cushion, making prolonged closures economically catastrophic.

2024 Geopolitical Dynamics

Hormuz remained open throughout 2024, but tensions between Iran and Western powers kept risk premiums elevated:

U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations: Periodic talks over Iran's nuclear program create binary risk events. Breakdown in negotiations historically correlates with increased Iranian rhetoric about "closing Hormuz."

Proxy conflicts: Iran-backed Houthi attacks in the Red Sea (affecting Suez/Bab el-Mandeb) demonstrated Iran's willingness to use asymmetric tactics. While Hormuz saw no direct attacks, insurance markets priced higher tail risk.

Saudi-Iran normalization: A March 2023 China-brokered diplomatic agreement between Saudi Arabia and Iran reduced immediate conflict risk, helping keep Hormuz insurance premiums below 2019 levels despite regional instability.

U.S. Navy presence: Fifth Fleet maintains continuous patrols in the Gulf, providing deterrence. However, Iranian fast-attack boats and anti-ship missiles create asymmetric threat potential.

Economic Alternatives

Unlike other chokepoints with clear geographic alternatives (Suez has Cape of Good Hope, Malacca has Sunda Strait), Hormuz has limited options:

East-West Pipeline (Saudi Arabia): 5 million barrels/day capacity, bypasses Hormuz but terminates on the Red Sea (exposing cargo to Bab el-Mandeb risks).

UAE-Oman pipeline: Under construction, designed for 1-2 million barrels/day, bypasses Hormuz but years from completion.

Economic reality: Most Persian Gulf oil producers have no viable alternative at current export volumes. Hormuz closure would force production cuts, not just rerouting.

Trading Strategies

Binary markets: "Will Hormuz experience forced closure (over 24 hours) due to military action in 2025?" Low probability, high payout tail risk hedge.

Scalar markets: "Hormuz War Risk Insurance Premium — Quarterly Average" (range $50k-$500k per voyage). Tracks geopolitical tension in real-time.

Oil price correlations: Long Hormuz disruption risk + long Brent crude futures. Tail risk hedge for energy-dependent portfolios.

Diplomatic event markets: "Will U.S.-Iran nuclear deal be signed by Q3 2025?" Resolution reduces Hormuz risk premium; price drop creates trading opportunity.

Attention: Unlike Suez/Panama with daily operational data, Hormuz trading relies on geopolitical indicators: nuclear talks, military incidents, diplomatic announcements. Less frequent data creates wider spreads and higher event risk.

5. Bab el-Mandeb: The Red Sea's Southern Gate

Location: Between Yemen and Djibouti/Eritrea, connecting Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Width at narrowest point: 29 kilometers (18 miles) Annual traffic: 20,000+ vessels (pre-2024); ~8,000-10,000 in 2024 Cargo types: Containers, crude oil (6.2 million barrels/day), LNG

Why It Matters

Bab el-Mandeb ("Gate of Grief" in Arabic) is the southern gateway to the Red Sea and Suez Canal. Every vessel using Suez from the Indian Ocean must transit Bab el-Mandeb, creating perfect correlation: Bab el-Mandeb disruptions automatically become Suez disruptions.

6.2 million barrels of oil per day passed through Bab el-Mandeb in 2023, making it the fourth-largest oil chokepoint globally. It's particularly critical for European crude imports from the Middle East.

2024 Crisis: Houthi Attacks

Yemen's Houthi forces, backed by Iran, launched unprecedented attacks on commercial vessels starting November 2023. Using drones, anti-ship missiles, and attempted boardings, Houthis targeted vessels with perceived links to Israel, the U.S., or the UK, citing solidarity with Palestinians during the Gaza conflict.

Over 50 attacks occurred between November 2023 and October 2024, including successful strikes on cargo ships, tankers, and military vessels. While most attacks failed or caused minor damage, the psychological and insurance market impact was severe:

War risk premiums increased 500%+ for vessels transiting Bab el-Mandeb, from $50,000 to $250,000-350,000 per voyage.

Container lines suspended Red Sea routing: Maersk, MSC, CMA CGM, Hapag-Lloyd all diverted to Cape of Good Hope. Container traffic through Bab el-Mandeb dropped over 80%.

Tanker traffic more resilient: Oil tankers, particularly those carrying Middle Eastern crude to Asia, continued transiting at reduced volumes. Some vessels increased speed through the strait, minimizing exposure time.

Coalition naval response: The U.S. launched Operation Prosperity Guardian, deploying warships and shoot-down capabilities. European nations contributed vessels. Despite this, attacks continued sporadically, preventing normalization.

Economic Impact

Bab el-Mandeb disruptions had cascading effects:

Asia-Europe supply chain elongation: Cape routing added 10-14 days, reducing annual vessel capacity by 15-20% due to longer round-trip times. This contributed to freight rate spikes.

Red Sea economies suffered: Egypt's Suez Canal revenue dropped 50%, Djibouti's port volumes declined, and regional bunkering services lost business to Cape route alternatives (South African ports, Mauritius).

Energy route flexibility: Unlike containers (which overwhelmingly switched to Cape), oil tankers had mixed responses. Some continued via Bab el-Mandeb, accepting risk premiums as cheaper than longer routes.

Trading Strategies

Binary markets: "Will Bab el-Mandeb experience zero Houthi attacks in any month during 2025?" Resolution via verified maritime security reports. Signals complete normalization.

Attack frequency scalars: "Bab el-Mandeb Monthly Attacks Index" (range 0-20 attacks/month). Tracks escalation or de-escalation trends.

Correlation with Suez: Long Bab el-Mandeb security improvement + long Suez Canal transits. These are nearly 1:1 correlated; trade the spread only if you see divergence (e.g., Suez recovering while Bab el-Mandeb remains risky).

Geopolitical triggers: "Will Gaza ceasefire agreement be reached by Q2 2025?" Houthi attacks explicitly tied to Gaza conflict; resolution would likely reduce attack frequency.

Insurance premium mean reversion: Short war risk premiums if you believe coalition naval presence will stabilize security. Current $250k+ premiums offer short opportunity vs. $50k baseline.

Related reading: The Red Sea Crisis: From Houthi Attacks to Cape Routing

Cross-Chokepoint Strategies: Index Baskets and Correlation Plays

Individual chokepoints rarely move in isolation. 2024's simultaneous disruptions across Panama (drought) and Suez/Bab el-Mandeb (security) created compounding supply chain stress. Index basket strategies capture these correlations:

Global Chokepoint Stress Index

Components:

Rationale: Measures aggregate disruption across all five chokepoints. High index values signal widespread supply chain stress, correlating with elevated freight rates, port congestion, and inventory shortages.

Use case: Hedge for businesses dependent on timely international shipments. Rising index triggers contingency planning (air freight, safety stock increases).

Route Substitution Basket

Long positions: Cape of Good Hope traffic, Sunda Strait (Malacca alternative), U.S. intermodal rail volumes Short positions: Suez transits, Panama transits, Malacca transits

Rationale: Profits when primary chokepoints experience disruptions and traffic shifts to alternatives. Pure play on routing economics without directional trade volume exposure.

Asia-Europe Supply Chain Integrity Index

Components:

Rationale: End-to-end view of the world's highest-volume trade lane. Disruption at any node reduces index value.

Use case: European retailers and Asian manufacturers can hedge landed cost volatility. Index decline correlates with longer lead times and higher freight costs.

Data Sources and Leading Indicators

Effective chokepoint trading requires real-time data that leads official statistics:

IMF PortWatch: Satellite AIS tracking of 90,000 vessels, updated weekly (Tuesdays 9 AM ET). Covers all 27 major global chokepoints with 95%+ accuracy vs official sources. Provides 5-10 day lead on monthly government reports.

Lloyd's List Intelligence: Maritime security incidents, insurance quotes, vessel tracking. War risk premiums update daily; critical for Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb.

Panama Canal Authority: Daily transit data, Gatun Lake levels, auction results published at https://www.pancanal.com/en/. Updated each morning.

Suez Canal Authority: Monthly reports (lag 5-10 business days) at https://www.suezcanal.gov.eg/. Less timely than IMF PortWatch but official resolution source.

Shipping line announcements: Maersk, MSC, CMA CGM investor calls and operational updates. Route resumptions announced 20-30 days before first vessels transit.

Freight rate indices: Drewry World Container Index, Shanghai Containerized Freight Index (SCFI), Baltic Dry Index. Updated weekly; reflect routing economics in real-time.

Weather and climate data: NOAA El Nino forecasts (predict Panama rainfall), Gatun Lake gauge readings, monsoon timing for Malacca.

Risk Management for Chokepoint Trading

Chokepoint markets exhibit high event risk (attacks, blockages, policy changes). Specialized risk management is essential:

Position sizing: Limit individual chokepoint exposure to 5-10% of trading capital. Simultaneous disruptions (2024's Panama + Suez crisis) can correlate, violating diversification assumptions.

Use limit orders exclusively: Spread widening during breaking news (Houthi attack, Panama restriction announcement) can cause 10-20% slippage on market orders. Set limit prices based on pre-calculated value.

Event hedging: For high-conviction directional positions, hedge tail risk with out-of-the-money binary options. Example: Long Suez normalization + cheap "YES" on "Will major Houthi attack occur in next 30 days?"

Monitor news in real-time: Set alerts for carrier announcements, canal authority updates, geopolitical developments, insurance market moves. Chokepoint markets react intraday to material news.

Resolution timing matters: IMF PortWatch updates Tuesdays 9 AM ET. Official canal authority reports lag 1-4 weeks. Know which data source resolves your markets and position accordingly.

Correlation risk: Don't assume chokepoints are independent. Panama and Suez both disrupted simultaneously in 2024. Size aggregate exposure conservatively.

Geopolitical unpredictability: Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb trading involves forecasting state and non-state actor behavior. Assign higher uncertainty margins than weather-driven (Panama) or pure infrastructure (Suez) events.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Which chokepoint offers the best trading opportunities for beginners?

Panama Canal provides the most transparent, data-rich environment. Daily transit counts, Gatun Lake levels, and ACP announcements are publicly available and predictive. Drought risk is weather-based (more modelable than geopolitics), and alternatives (U.S. intermodal rail) are well-understood. Start with Panama binary markets on monthly transit volumes.

2. How correlated are Suez and Bab el-Mandeb markets?

Nearly 1:1 correlated. Bab el-Mandeb is the mandatory gateway to Suez for Indian Ocean traffic. Trade them as a single unit unless you identify specific divergence (e.g., Suez northbound from Mediterranean vs. southbound through Bab el-Mandeb).

3. Can I trade chokepoint disruptions if I don't have shipping industry expertise?

Yes. Prediction markets democratize access to these opportunities. Unlike freight derivatives (requiring industry relationships), platforms like Ballast Markets offer retail-accessible contracts. Focus on binary markets (simpler) initially; graduate to scalar markets as you build conviction in magnitude forecasting.

4. What's the typical holding period for chokepoint trades?

Varies by market type:

Match your holding period to your analytical edge. Short-term trading requires real-time data monitoring; longer themes allow fundamental analysis.

5. How do I know when a chokepoint disruption is "priced in"?

Compare market-implied probabilities to your independent estimate. If binary market shows 70% probability of Suez normalization and your analysis says 45%, market has overpriced recovery—trade accordingly. Use freight rate futures, insurance quotes, and shipping line guidance to calibrate your estimates.

6. What's the relationship between chokepoint markets and port markets?

Chokepoint disruptions cascade to ports. Suez closure increases Rotterdam congestion (Cape-routed vessels), boosts Singapore bunker demand (longer routes), and reduces Suez-adjacent port volumes (Port Said, Jeddah). Trade these correlations via index baskets spanning chokepoints and connected ports.

7. Are there seasonal patterns in chokepoint disruptions?

Yes for weather-driven risks:

Geopolitical chokepoints (Hormuz, Bab el-Mandeb) have no reliable seasonality; track diplomatic calendars, conflict cycles, election timelines.

8. How do I hedge physical business exposure using chokepoint markets?

Match your cargo flows to market exposure:

Size hedge based on cargo value at risk and ability to absorb spot market costs.

9. What happens if multiple chokepoints fail simultaneously?

2024 demonstrated simultaneous Panama (drought) + Suez (security) disruptions. Effects compound: global vessel capacity tightens faster, alternative routes become congested, freight rates spike across ALL lanes (not just affected routes). Index baskets capturing aggregate chokepoint stress outperform single-chokepoint trades during systemic crises.

10. Where can I learn more about specific chokepoint trading strategies?

Ballast Markets offers detailed guides for each chokepoint:

Start Trading Chokepoint Markets

The five chokepoints examined here—Malacca, Suez, Panama, Hormuz, and Bab el-Mandeb—control over 60% of maritime trade flows. Their disruptions create predictable, measurable volatility in freight rates, port congestion, commodity prices, and supply chain timing.

Prediction markets transform these disruptions from headlines into tradeable contracts with clear resolution criteria, transparent pricing, and defined risk/reward. Whether you're hedging business exposure, speculating on geopolitical developments, or capturing routing economics arbitrage, chokepoint markets offer institutional-quality strategies in retail-accessible formats.

Ready to trade global chokepoints? Explore Ballast Markets' chokepoint strategies or learn about reading maritime signals.

Disclaimer

This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Trading prediction markets involves risk, including total loss of capital. Geopolitical and weather events are inherently uncertain. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data references include IMF PortWatch, U.S. EIA, Panama Canal Authority, and maritime intelligence sources (accessed October 2024-January 2025).

Start Trading Global Trade Signals

Put these insights into action.

Explore Prediction Markets on Ballast →

Trade port volumes, shipping delays, chokepoint disruptions, and tariff impacts. Ballast Markets offers binary and scalar contracts on the global trade signals discussed in this analysis.